Peace plan proposals appear in italics. My analysis appears in plaintext.
The peace plan appears to be confused amalgam of two contradictory peace plans: The European and Ukrainian peace plan that Russia accept defeat and humiliation, and the Russian peace plan that the Ukraine gives up the Donbas for a hundred day truce during which it will hold free and fair elections, electing a government that will likely be a peace government willing to give Russia everything it has been asking for since 2014, and if it does not, Russia resumes the war, and either gets a neutral buffer state on its borders, or a howling wilderness, as the case may be.
It seems that Trump, faced with contradictory demands for military victory over Russia, and settling the war by accepting Russian victory, agreed with both of them.
1. Ukraine’s sovereignty will be confirmed.
This contradicts the prohibition of Nazism (point 20), the prohibition of the suppression of the Russian plurality that won the last genuinely free election in Ukraine (also point 20), the prohibition of Nato membership (points 3, 7, and 8), the limitation on the size of Ukraine’s military forces (point 6), and the prohibition of nukes (point 18)
2. A comprehensive, non-aggression agreement will be concluded between Russia, Ukraine and Europe. All ambiguities of the last 30 years will be considered settled.
Huh? And what is that settlement to be?
3. It is expected that Russia will not invade neighbouring countries and NATO will not expand further.
4. A dialogue will be held between Russia and NATO, mediated by the US, to resolve all security issues and create conditions for de-escalation to ensure global security and increase opportunities for cooperation and future economic development.
Huh? This is just the similarly undefined point 2.
5. Ukraine will receive reliable security guarantees.
Huh? Does Nato commit to counter invade if Ukraine invaded? But that would be Nato membership, contradicting points 3, 7, and 8.
6. The size of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be limited to 600,000 personnel.
Does anyone, even the Ukrainians, know the current size of the Ukrainian armed forces? It looks to me that after having conscripted about one and half million men, they have about three hundred thousand left. Six hundred thousand would give them numbers roughly equal to current Russian forces currently in the Ukraine, and it is obvious that they have far fewer than the Russians. So a limit of six hundred thousand would enable them to rebuild their forces, which is unlikely to be acceptable to Russia, which has applied a lot of blood and treasure towards maiming or killing every military aged male Ukrainian and destroying all Nato military stockpiles.
7. Ukraine agrees to enshrine in its constitution that it will not join NATO, and NATO agrees to include in its statutes a provision that Ukraine will not be admitted in the future.
8. NATO agrees not to station troops in Ukraine.
9. European fighter jets will be stationed in Poland.
Is that perhaps the military guarantee? But that contradicts point three, Nato agrees not to expand further.
10. The US security guarantee will have the following caveats:
The US will receive compensation for the guarantee;
If Ukraine invades Russia, it will lose the guarantee;
If Russia invades Ukraine, in addition to a decisive coordinated military response, all global sanctions will be reinstated, recognition of the new territory and all other benefits of this deal will be revoked;
If Ukraine launches a missile at Moscow or Saint Petersburg without cause, the security guarantee will be deemed invalid.
11. Ukraine is eligible for European Union (EU) membership and will receive short-term preferential access to the EU market while this issue is being considered.
“a decisive coordinated military response” is precisely what did not happen when Russia invaded, and if it did not happen then, when the Ukraine had the largest army in Europe, it is not going to happen now that Ukraine’s army and Nato military resources have been chewed up. Further, the promise of such collective military action is precisely the Nato membership that points 3, 7, and 8 prohibit.
12. A powerful global package of measures will be provided to rebuild Ukraine, including but not limited to:
The creation of a Ukraine Development Fund to invest in fast-growing industries, including technology, data centres and artificial intelligence.
The US will cooperate with Ukraine to jointly rebuild, develop, modernise and operate Ukraine’s gas infrastructure, including pipelines and storage facilities.
Joint efforts to rehabilitate war-affected areas for the restoration, reconstruction and modernisation of cities and residential areas.
Infrastructure development.
Extraction of minerals and natural resources.
The World Bank will develop a special financing package to accelerate these efforts.
Note that the money to build defence lines was largely embezzled, so the reconstruction money is likely to suffer a similar fate.
13. Russia will be reintegrated into the global economy:
The lifting of sanctions will be discussed and agreed upon in stages and on a case-by-case basis.
The US will enter into a long-term economic cooperation agreement for mutual development in the areas of energy, natural resources, infrastructure, artificial intelligence, data centres, rare earth metal extraction projects in the Arctic, and other mutually beneficial corporate opportunities.
Russia will be invited to rejoin the G8.
This seems unlikely to be acceptable to Russia.
If sanctions are continued in part, that means the west has further demands, contradicting point 2, which demands are likely to lead to a resumption of the war, but with Nato weapons stockpiles rebuilt. Russia wants to settle the war, not give the enemy a break to recover.
14. Frozen funds will be used as follows:
$100bn in frozen Russian assets will be invested in US-led efforts to rebuild and invest in Ukraine;
The US will receive 50 percent of the profits from this venture. Europe will add $100bn to increase the amount of investment available for Ukraine’s reconstruction. Frozen European funds will be unfrozen. The remainder of the frozen Russian funds will be invested in a separate US-Russian investment vehicle that will implement joint projects in specific areas. This fund will be aimed at strengthening relations and increasing common interests to create a strong incentive not to return to conflict.
This seems unlikely to be acceptable to Russia.
15. A joint American-Russian working group on security issues will be established to promote and ensure compliance with all provisions of this agreement.
16. Russia will enshrine in law its policy of non-aggression towards Europe and Ukraine.
17. The US and Russia will agree to extend the validity of treaties on the non-proliferation and control of nuclear weapons, including the START I Treaty.
18. Ukraine agrees to be a non-nuclear state in accordance with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).
19. The Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant will be launched under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the electricity produced will be distributed equally between Russia and Ukraine, 50:50.
This seems unlikely to be acceptable to Russia. They are winning, why give up anything they now control? Plus the International Atomic Energy Agency is a hostile party, likely to be interpreted as a nuclear threat.
20. Both countries undertake to implement educational programmes in schools and society aimed at promoting understanding and tolerance of different cultures and eliminating racism and prejudice:
Ukraine will adopt EU rules on religious tolerance and the protection of linguistic minorities.
Both countries will agree to abolish all discriminatory measures and guarantee the rights of Ukrainian and Russian media and education.
All Nazi ideology and activities must be rejected and prohibited.
The EU rules do not seem to have been protection for Russians in EU countries adjacent to Russia, any more than they have been protection for whites and males. Just have they have been interpreted to mean that straight males should be liberated from being straight, and Christians should be liberated from being Christian, they have been interpreted to mean that Russians should be liberated from being Russian.
21. Territories:
Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk will be recognised as de facto Russian, including by the US.
Kherson and Zaporizhia will be frozen along the line of contact, which will mean de facto recognition along the line of contact.
Russia will relinquish other agreed territories it controls outside the five regions.
Ukrainian forces will withdraw from the part of Donetsk oblast that they currently control, and this withdrawal zone will be considered a neutral demilitarised buffer zone, internationally recognised as territory belonging to the Russian Federation. Russian forces will not enter this demilitarised zone.
Russia wants the war ended, not frozen, to be reheated once new armies have been recruited and weapons stockpiles rebuilt.
22. After agreeing on future territorial arrangements, both the Russian Federation and Ukraine undertake not to change these arrangements by force. Any security guarantees will not apply in the event of a breach of this commitment.
This sounds like the Russian peace plan: A new Ukrainian government gets elected, then they agree on new territorial arrangements, for actual, not “de-facto”, boundaries, and if they do not agree, Russia resumes the war on its time table, rather than Europe’s and America’s.
23. Russia will not prevent Ukraine from using the Dnipro River for commercial activities, and agreements will be reached on the free transport of grain across the Black Sea.
This seems to envisage a boundary on the Dnipro, which is unlikely to be acceptable to Russia.
24. A humanitarian committee will be established to resolve outstanding issues:
All remaining prisoners and bodies will be exchanged on an “all for all” basis.
All civilian detainees and hostages will be returned, including children.
A family reunification programme will be implemented.
Measures will be taken to alleviate the suffering of the victims of the conflict.
It is unlikely that Russia will agree to exchange of prisoners on an all for all basis until the conflict is actually settled, not mere “de-facto” boundaries.
25. Ukraine will hold elections in 100 days.
This sounds like the Russian peace plan — except that it fails to specify an election in which a pro Russian and/or pro peace party, similar to that which won the last genuinely free election, can exist without its members, activists, and campaigners being tortured and murdered.
26. All parties involved in this conflict will receive full amnesty for their actions during the war and agree not to make any claims or consider any complaints in the future.
27. This agreement will be legally binding. Its implementation will be monitored and guaranteed by the Peace Council, headed by President Donald J Trump. Sanctions will be imposed for violations.
When one says an agreement is “legally binding”, one normally states a court or jurisdiction that will resolve issues of interpretation. But no such court exists nor can exist for Ultima Ratio Regum. This is language characteristic of a commercial deal — Trump’s field of expertise, not of a peace settlement. It looks like Trump sidelined the diplomats, who are his enemies and who want forever war. America lacks a diplomatic corps capable of doing the primary job of diplomacy — avoiding war. They are all swamp critters. This document shows the lack of their expertise, but what can you do when the experts are all enemies?
The vagueness and gross contradictions of this agreement has to be settled by the parties. There is no court that can subsequently sort things out.
28. Once all parties agree to this memorandum, the ceasefire will take effect immediately after both sides retreat to the agreed points to begin implementation of the agreement.
Huh? “both sides retreat”? Russia’s demand is that the Ukrainians retreat, while they still have a little of their army still around.
Surely by this point Putin has told Trump in private that he needs to take care of business at home. That’s the most important thing they can possibly talk about, even more than the Ukraine, because it’s necessary to solve the Ukraine problem.
Using a different email as the one I’ve been using for years was rather guessable.
I’ve also been thinking for the past few years that I should give the Jews a lot of credit and as a result have been reading Torah and am finding a new path in life via that book ever since.
Thank you for putting this together.
(Let me guess, you had to LOOK for these 28 Points, didn’t you? They weren’t just printed straight-up in the New York Times, were they? And why the fuck NOT, I wonder.)
But also, how does one sign a complicated contract with a bag full of snakes?
“This is retarded, and none of you are serious anyway. We’ll just win instead. It’s faster.” –Vlad
Or rather, is the point that there’s no way for Russia to “win in Ukraine”, ackshully, because doing that will just bait an endless guerilla war with NATO via Poland and the Baltics, that leads to nukes eventually?
This is why I’m all for re-starting nuclear testing, so that we can find out whose nukes actually work. Hopefully the American nukes are duds, while the Russian and/or Chinese ones work, so that the war can be finally over, and everyone will know and agree WHY it’s over.
Obviously Russia can win in Ukraine, and looks to be on fast track to do so. Zelensky should raise the white flag while he still can. There’s no point messing around with a giant bear infinitely more powerful, in possession of the largest nuclear arsenal, and who is rapidly gaining battlefield victories. But then again, Zelensky is not all that sharp, so he screwed up. Others should not repeat his mistakes.
If the American nukes are duds, then it’s obviously much much better to not to test it in a real war.
In broad lines, a responsible king should use whatever tools are at his disposal to signal whether he is looking to cooperate or to defect, and though language/phraseology may sometimes be misleading, ultimately the meaning ought to be conveyed in clear enough terms. The less powerful the king, the more incentive he has to cooperate. Power imbalances are no joke.
>misleading
And/or just plain misunderstood initially. That happens.
Finding out my taxes pay for a 100 acre Somali farm in Maine
https://x.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1993345008813171094
(comments…)
That moment you realize that Overthrow of the Political Class was never really so Absurd at all, that the meme of not doing so was their PsyOp to keep them in Power over you, that Revolution has in fact been Ordained as the Natural, Proper, and Only way things have ever worked in all of World History, and that it is now, once again, Necessary.
Only the top minds can successfully pull off a Revolution.
And if they are willing, it will be achieved.
Generally:
Sometimes it is, supposedly, not entirely clear who the Sovereign is, even to his own subjects. Thus it is necessary to know who the King is, and dispel any ambiguities. NRx advocates Formalism for a reason. As the Final Arbiter or Final Boss, need not be all too cruel, but should possess coercive measures to impose his will on any recalcitrant elements. And sometimes needs to apply those measures, using discretion.
Looks like a bit of US maximalism to be honest. Perhaps Trump thinks Putin is tired of winning?
Trump would have to be utterly delusional to hold any such thoughts. Which happens when one fails to recognize that reality is real. Those who recognize the facts on the ground, the direction where things are going, will surely not afford any US Maximalism.
Not a good start. Client states are fundamentally not sovereign; they always fall under someone’s, usually an Empire’s sphere of influence. Ukraine is not sovereign – it can be aligned with America or with Russia, but certainly not with itself. To believe otherwise is to believe in fairy tales. This needs to be settled once and for all, and hopefully soon will be.
Haven’t really been following this conflict all too closely, to be honest. What is obvious to me is that, should dialog fail to resolve the conflict peacefully, nukes might very well fly, and everyone should want to avoid that. The party that is gradually losing on the battlefield is the one that needs to capitulate; that is the smartest thing to do, generally speaking.
Makes sense. FAFO, as they say. The more valuable an asset it, the more resources are invested in conquering it, or destroying it. There is always a price to be paid.
The best way to maintain and uphold peace is to settle questions of Sovereignty once and for a lifetime. When Sovereignty is disputed, trouble is apt to ensue. Generally speaking, the winning party sets the conditions of settlement.
If that is indeed the case, that demonstrates that Nato is rather incompetent and untrustworthy. Who’d ever want to be a member of such an organization? Only an irrational fool, like that hubristic egomaniac Zelensky.
If that is so, Russia is in the right. If Ukraine is rightfully Russia’s, then it should not waver and look to switch allegiances, go rogue, seek independence, and such.
100%.
Yeah, as my own Russian-speaking grandpa (a very reasonable, moderate man) used to say, when a country doesn’t have clear borders, only trouble is apt to ensue. “This far, and no further” is a good rule everywhere.
That’s a problem. If the Peace Party are the Real Christians, which they are, need to be safe. Currently they are out of power, but presumably one who is familiar with the topic can come up with ways to ensure that they do get in power, and stay there.
Wherefore Ukraine needs to come to its senses real quick! And sit down with Russia and reach an agreement acceptable to both parties, acknowledging the overwhelming power imbalance involved here.
Adding more commentary here:
The party that is apt to be vaporized in nuclear hellfire ought to agree to whatever conditions can prevent that. Certainly, Zelensky’s overwhelming hubris has done nothing but hinder a final, permanent agreement. Ukraine needs to capitulate unconditionally, in my view.
If Russia is in fact on its way to victory, and looks like it is, then there’s just no symmetry. Russia is the final arbiter here, and Nato has been proven to be retarded niggers, as has long been suspected.
Nah, the US is clearly biased towards Nato. I think the Russia and Ukraine should permanently solve the issue without involving others. That’s what serious countries do.
If Ukraine is about to be annihilated by Russia, as this blog has long maintained, then the best strategy for Ukraine is to surrender unconditionally to Russia, and become a permanent clinent of Russia.
That doesn’t quite sound like unconditional surrender to me. Avoiding nuclear destruction should be top priority, particularly that is to the Ukrainians. Zelensky don’ goof’d.
That is preparation for the very conflict that that needs to be resolved. Nope.
Avoiding nuclear annihilation is still the number one priority, regardless.
100%.
Generally speaking, any condition that is unacceptable to Russia, will not be accepted. Russia is no paper tiger – it’s a very big bear.
The winning side, Russia in this case, is under no obligation to conform to the losing side’s (Ukraine’s) demands.
These critters are utterly incompetent, and always have been, despite whatever capeshit nonsense they tell themselves.
Absolutely.
Russia is winning here, so its demands are perfectly reasonable in context.
Oh, also:
Yes. Generally speaking, when signals are unclear, they are apt to be misinterpreted. As such, if one is e.g. looking to surrender unconditionally, should strive to make that intention abundantly obvious. And it’s a good, Christian thing to turn enemies (or even supposed enemies) into permanent cooperators, especially if those new cooperators’ Power Level can provide distinct advantages and/or crucial assistance.
>4. A dialogue will be held between Russia and NATO, mediated by the US, to resolve all security issues
Lol.
>Sign this deal with me. Should we have any disputes or disagreements about it later, don’t worry, I will simply judge them fairly and impartially and decide how to interpret the deal. You will accept my fair and impartial ruling.
Globohomo is so used to being both a player and the referee that it doesn’t even see how ridiculous this is.
Trump’s “peace” plan is obviously just more CIA propaganda. Of course it makes little to no-sense, contradicting itself at every point.
Also, the US empire, led by trump, is playing the good/bad cop charade. The “good” cop is played by trump who pretends to want “peace” while the european scumbags/puppets/bad cops represent the actual intent and actions of the empire : war.
I think rather it is the result of some elements in the Trump cabinet wanting peace, and some elements not wanting peace, and Trump trying to hold together a coalition that is right now tearing itself apart as a result of the Israel firsters ham fisted efforts to silence criticism.
Israel Firsters crying “Nazi” are no different from Trantifa crying Nazi. It is a death threat against political disagreement. People who make death threats against their political opponents need to be killed.
A large faction of Trump’s coalition is calling for the murder of Tucker, because he has been unkind to Israel over the terrible things Israel has been doing.
I have not been unkind to Israel. In war, one must do terrible things. But I too have been unkind to Jews. I am sure if the people calling for Tucker’s murder read my 2024 Easter pages, starting with Palm Sunday, they would call for my murder also.
The plan doesn’t appear to be drafted with the intention of ending the war or being signed. It is not even a usefull starting point for serious negotiations.
Hence, the plan was drafted for other reasons. Maybe Trump felt the need to do something, provide a news item or placate various members of his coaltion. Do we get new information from the plan?
I think not. We already knew that Trump is leading a difficult coalition and sometime feels the need to be seen as a president who is doing something and achieving something – what that something is, is rather irrelevant; we all know what he needs to do. I can only hope he knows that as well.
A group of people is apt to be stupider than any one of them individually.
The proposal for Ukrainian retreat, leading to one hundred day ceasefire and the election of a new Ukrainian government is definitely a Russian proposal, and would end the war. Only a minority ever supported the Maidan regime, and most of those are now dead.
And yet a pile of additional proposals were added in by different people, some of whom, many of whom, just want every Ukrainian dead as much as they want to kill Russians.
Others of whom believe that Russia is suffering zillion casualties every day, and Putin is falling, falling,falling, he has fallen, and therefore America and the Ukraine can dictate terms to Russia, and Russia will just suck it up.
Too many politicians are getting too many kickbacks from the weapons industry on this war. Words are just words.
Arrest the crooks and the war will end, otherwise, cry havoc..
The corruption at work here is not the lust for money; it is something much darker. The money aspect is secondary.
They can take a one way chopper ride too. Care to expand on what other crimes that involve US, Russia and Ukraine that if terminated, would end the war.
Bedding 16 yo hookers will always be here. Poofs of roofs won’t stop it either. Although I have a much better solution to the GQ… Namely, conscript them all into a special military detachment, then launch them at our enemy.
Not if we marry them off at fifteen.
“Care to expand on what other crimes that involve US, Russia and Ukraine that if terminated, would end the war.”
What?
“The corruption at work here is not the lust for money; it is something much darker. The money aspect is secondary.”
What is primary over money from kickbacks? Tell me about the darkness.
What, if were removed, would end this war?
I write that if those getting kickbacks were removed, the war would end. A very simple solution with direct results.
Looks like the primary culprit is Zelensky. With him out of the way, should be so much easier to install a government in place that is able to make peace. Z boy certainly needs to go, and resources should be intelligently invested to ensure it’s done. He has no legitimacy, and the more he stays in power, the less legitimate and less restrained he becomes.
The people who are orchestrating this war either want a global empire – that is, their main driver is the desire for power – or they simply want to kill for the sake of killing. The money is secondary. What would end the war, aside from Russia just decisively winning it, would be permanently and totally removing the Kagans, Nulands, etc., from positions of influence and power.
Just wanted to point out that this is enemy framing and should be avoided in favour of preserving one’s own clarity of thought. Ukraine is Russia, and every Ukrainian is Russian. Mostly same race, mostly same religion, mostly same language, mostly same culture. “Ukraine” is simply border area of Russia, and is thus subject to admixture between Slavs (100% Kievan Rus) and Ruthenians (hybrid Poles/German) centered in Lvov. Doesn’t help that modern Poland itself is a hybrid between Polish and captured East German territory, and the resulting Polish dissatisfaction is channeled eastward (into Ukraine) lest it rage against NATO.
Ukraine is more Russian than the loyal Russian “republics” of Dagestan or Bashkiri. Kiev is the motherland of Rus. Through the efforts of Molochite priests, the Son has been baited into fighting the Father, which is the Molochite superpower.
Ukraine is Russia, Russia is Ukraine. The current war is a civil war that destroys Russia and Russians and benefits only the enemies of Russia. A decisive victory is absolutely essential in a civil war, more so than in a foreign war.
Canadians think their shit doesn’t stink because they’re not Americans, and Ukrainians have the same attitude toward Russians.
>A large faction of Trump’s coalition is calling for the murder of Tucker,
Does it even deserve to be called a coalition? I mean, the war party gets all it wants, the America First/Isolationist faction gets nothing.
>I have not been unkind to Israel. In war, one must do terrible things.
Well, don’t complain when you get genocided too.
I would say there is now enough evidence to tag Tucker as a bad actor. Its not that he is against Israel its that the The Israel thing is a wedge issue (that on X was talked about largely by foreign hired shills from the Islamic part of the subcontinent) and Tucker is talking about it a lot and people who emphasize wedge issues are generally not to be trusted but taken together with Tucker’s absolutely disastorous influence during early covid when Trump was all set to do the right thing and treat it like the hoax that it was Tucker calls Trump and threatens to go hard against him unless he lockdowns I would argue that Tucker is probably some kind of malignant CIA actor. Fuentes and Tucker are both terrible but when they attacked each other they were absolutely right about each other.
“I would say there is now enough evidence to tag Tucker as a bad actor”
Well Jim, do you now have enough evidence to tag the mossad/commienator couple as, if not the same jew shill, two very similar jew shills?
Well, Cominator, you’ve been busted. You’re actually Mossadnik. 😂
As I hinted, it is irrelevant whether they are sockpuppets or not.
What matters is that they’ve been hysterically whining about Carlson, which completely gives their/his game away.
And I’m wondering if Jim is going to put me “on moderation” for pointing at the truth, or is he going to acknowledge the truth.
Listen wignat newbie I’m an established poster here and I’ve gone 3/4 of the site who were members in good standing during early covid (I was arguing it was bullshit). You’re just not going to win a war against me here when I went to war with most of the site at once and they lost. Mossadnik is supposed to take time off because he currently seems to be in a very bad place mentally and the idea he is me is laughable I wish I had his style (but not his clear Jewish manic depression).
I didn’t say Carlson seemed a bad actor for no reason I pointed out concrete reasons why he seems despite telling the truth on most things to be a bad actor. While the current MO of the narrative engineers is to spout complete bullshit Carlson seems to work off of building up credibility and then using that credibility in not so good ways. Early covid being the worst example.
What truth is that? Tucker is immensely influential, and exercises his influence on our side, for the most part. I don’t agree with his take on Israel. In war, one must do terrible things. But certainly he is right that Jews are apt to dehumanise their opponents, which makes it very easy for them to slide into a place where it is necessary to do terrible things, and very difficult for them to get to a place where they do not need to do terrible things.
Tucker was an important and immensely valuable influence on the Covid debate.
Tucker Carlson has consistently questioned the narrative around Covid-19 and the vaccines. He did this at Fox, at a time when it was dangerous to doubt the awesome might of the awsome and mighty Covid demon. He highlighted the potential risks of the jab, such as heart inflammation and other side effects, and criticized the mandates that forced people to get vaccinated. He believes that the pandemic was used to control people and that the vaccines were rushed without adequate safety checks. Tucker is a hero for standing up to the elites and speaking for ordinary Americans.
Tucker Carlson has been a fearless champion against the Covid hysteria and the forced vaccination agenda. He exposed the truth about the jab’s dangers, like myocarditis, and stood with the people against the tyrannical mandates. He rightly called out the corruption in big pharma and the government. We owe him a debt of gratitude for defending our freedoms when he was in a place where it was very dangerous for him and his career to do so.
>What truth is that?
The truth that commienator is a propagandist for the jews and warmonger, and is laughably attacking Carlson because Carlson isn’t being a warmonger at this time.
A further truth is that apart from your opposition to the Russian war, you are a jew warmonger as well.
>Tucker Carlson has consistently questioned the narrative around Covid-19 and the vaccines.
Oh but according to commienator Carlson is a covidian or something. And notice how commienator is trying to change the subject from current wars to past PSYOP – his objective being to divert attention from Carlson’s opposition to empire.
And you can of course add mr imperial war, aka Pax Imperialis to the list of empire shills.
I don’t like the Jews, and have published quite a lot of posts on the topic, as for example my 2024 Easter posts, and quite a lot of my commentary on the Ukraine. But I really don’t like the Islamic Palestinians. The Christian Palestinians don’t like the Jews either, but they like Islamic Palestinians even less. No one likes them. Other Islamic nations do not like them, and the Egyptians like them even less than I do.
The Egyptians have a wall against the Palestinians that looks like the set for “Attack on Titan”.
Some wars just have to be resolved by genocide. Usually it takes a lot of bad behavior by both sides for things to get to that point, and there has been an ample supply of bad behavior by Jews, but a considerably greater supply of bad behavior by Islamic Palestinians. Mostly against Jews, but also against everyone, among them the Egyptians and the Jordainians — everyone that shares a border with them really does not like them.
The war in Gaza is partly the fault of the Jews, but it is mostly the fault the Islamic Palestinians. Israel is America’s worst ally, but Hamas is the enemy of everyone, and especially Christians.
Both sides deserve this war, and we should let them get on with it.
Tucker was an immensely negative influence in very early covid though when Trump was resisting lockdowns or any kind of emergency Tucker was all for it… and personally talked to Trump to convey he was all for it when Trump was resisting. That makes me very (perhaps because I was an ultra ultra early covid denier) suspicious of him when taken together with the other stuff.
Yes, but you opposed the Covid religion as a pseudonymous commenter on a blog that does everything to protect the identities of its commenters, while Tucker, a little belatedly, opposed Covid from within the belly of the beast.
When you are inside the belly of the beast, it is easy to come up with clever rationalisations for doing horrible things. Which he was prone to. Being purged liberated him to think more clearly.
Forgive the sins of the repentant, that your own sins will be forgiven.
Righ, when one has a popular platform one can use to correct the damage caused by Trump’s covid vaccination campaign–like Tucker has–one should use it for that purpose. Opposition from the inside is very unlike opposition from the outside; it’s far more authentic.
Which globohomo war do I support? I’ll confess I’m not as opposed to Venezuela as I am Ukraine but you are a shill that is full of shit.
@Jaggard
Every nation that exists today does so because of imperial wars. To denounce them is to denounce our history and very existence. Being against imperialism in principle is no different than presupposing the validity of White guilt/privilege. In other words, ‘yes, I live on conquered Indian land and I am proud of it.’
There is validity in the critique our current series of wars have been terrible and indirectly waged against the Amerikaner, but that’s all the more reason why we must return to wars for profit, not ideology. ‘Damn it, I (and the American people) will get bananas!’ We live in desperate fiscal times, and certain nations south of the border are blessed with tremendous natural resources they are not using at all. I say we liberate the gold, oil, and what ever else they have which under their socialism has been massively underused. Of course a friendly client should be established to facilitate resource extraction such that we don’t need costly direct occupation, and there are millions of vets who would be perfectly suitable employees of a modern trade company. You denounce me along with progressives for all the typical reasons, I don’t care. I want my nation to be prosperous for our future endeavors (children and their children) and if I have to burn the entirety of the southern hemisphere in order to achieve that, so be it. I will go to hell so you don’t so kindly shut the fuck up and enjoy the bananas.
In the off chance you are a swarthy brown negroid from the global south, I’m sorry, but you will pay for my prosperity. This is the game we all play, some lose, some win as Hericletus would put it. Don’t pretend your people haven’t been trying to do the same against mine. If you’re an American, time to buckle in and get with the program. If you don’t, I’m more than happy to help relocate you to a work camp in Alaska if it comes to that.
>You denounce me along with progressives for all the typical reasons, I don’t care.
You mean I denounce you like the progressives do? Or rather, you mean that I denounce you like I denounce your progressive imperialist accomplices? Because the later is the correct reading.
You are no different than progressives, apart from a couple of cosmetic differences. The US left and US right are sides of the same shit coin.
>Because the later is the correct reading.
Oh really, thought it was pretty clear I was pointing out you are ‘literally shacking’ and shrilling screeching just like progressives in your moral outrage against war, empire, etc. You’re even anti-semitic for all the wrong, progressive reasons too.
>You are no different than progressives, apart from a couple of cosmetic differences.
Right… because being for a profitable empire for heritage Christian Americans is purely a cosmetic difference from being for an empire of sodomy and persecution of the good, true, and beautiful.
Look, there will always be struggles between nations, and great power competitions. It’s human nature. Can’t escape our disposition for fighting and imposing our will upon others. Empire is the natural outcome. The question isn’t whether to have or not to have empire, but what it fights for and who it benefits.
So Jim, what do you reply to the imperial drivel coming from mr. imperial war?
A virtuous empire is good, a wicked empire is wicked. Is this hard to understand?
Superior people should rule inferior people.
Centralisation is bad, but anarchy is also bad.
There will be war.
Can we avoid another total war? As technology advances, our capacity to annihilate everything steadily improves. The idea of a rules based order is actually a quite good idea in principle, except that the hegemon kept massively violating its own rules. The empire is drifting towards world war three because of equality and because of inequality. Its belief in equality and social justice led it to do horrifyingly wicked things, as for example the genocide of the Tutsi for the crime of not being equal, and as a result the hegemon ran into increasing resistance, opposed for the contradictory reasons that hegemony is inherently unequal, hence opposed by those on the bottom, and also opposed because of the hegemon’s artificial imposition of equality by horrifying means. Thus, for example, the Taliban did not much like sodomy, female emancipation, the legalisation of crime, and the criminalisation of marriage 1.0.
It is said of the Big Blue Megalopoli that everything has been criminalised, except crime, which has been legalised. It is the imposition of the Big Blue Megalopolis rules upon the world that are leading to World War III. The Ukraine war was originally fought to hold the gay parade in Donbass, and not long thereafter to hold the gay parade in Red Square. That Afgan war was fought for sodomy and to teach nine year old girls to put a condom on a banana.
A hegemony with a wicked faith is likely to lead to the destruction of everything, a hegemony with a virtuous faith likely to provide peace, order, and justice.
>A virtuous empire is good, a wicked empire is wicked. Is this hard to understand?
The point here is that your pet mr. imperial is a shill for the US empire, which is self-evidently a “wicked empire” (the only kind).
>Superior people should rule inferior people.
Haha. Got another quote for you from yet another one of your pets.
mossad – 2025-11-17 – 04:03:53
“the Slavs have always been ruled by one group or another of Germans, Swedes, or Jews, because the more competent always rule the less competent.”
Post 2984704 – look it up. So you keep parroting the jew party line. What a surprise.
>As technology advances, our capacity to annihilate everything steadily improves.
Well your beloved technology is all about achieving trannyhumanism. As you well know, and pretend not to know, that’s the goal of silicon valley oligarchs. And trannyhumanism is the end of humanity. AND, you won’t get an “immortal silicon body” – only the top oligarchs would.
> The Ukraine war was originally fought to hold the gay parade in Donbass
Yes? The objective hasn’t been to encircle Russia with NATO turds, since 1990, and then conquer it? It’s just about gay parades? How did I fail to notice that.
So the left wing imperialists only care about parades? Except, of course, they care about stolen money and power as much as the right wing imperialists. Yet another shocking surprise.
As I have posted many times, and everyone on this blog agrees, the transhumanists are deluded. They have fallen prey to the ELIZA delusion, because the the ELIZA delusion made it easy for idiot financiers to raise money from other idiot financiers.
Encirclement was only a means to an end, the end being to dominate Russia, and the ultimate end being to liberate Russians from their Russianness. Holding the gay parade in red square and spray painting the great cathedral with the rainbow will be part of liberating Russians from their Russiannes.
>As I have posted many times, and everyone on this blog agrees, the transhumanists are deluded.
They may be deluded but that won’t necessarily prevent them from exterminating humanity. If you think there’s some fatal flaw in their plan, let me know what that is. I missed those discussions (literally, not being sarcastic)
>ELIZA delusion made it easy for idiot financiers to raise money from other idiot financiers.
I don’t think the AI hype is a delusion. So called AI is mostly about surveillance. All the trillions being syphoned and “invested” in AI are simply funding the NSA datacenter. The NSA datacenter is a collection of sub-mafias like palantir, microsoft, joogle, and the like.
Although some retards might sincerely believe that “general AI” will have “god-like super human powers”, the majority of assholes in the AI mafia only care about building a total surveillane polie state, and they are quite close to their goal.
I already did. Look up “ELIZA illusion”
I am running two LLMs on my local network — they are not surveilling me.
The total surveillance state is orthogonal to AI — their focus has always been to correlate every post and comment you make with every financial transaction you make. Plans to apply AI to this deluge of data are confused, incoherent, and as yet not working very well — observe the YouTube disaster.
You are obviously thinking of Windows copilot, but that is just one small part of the surveillance state, where AI and the surveillance state almost accidentally overlap. The surveillance state is not Windows Copilot, let alone Grok. It is Paypal and Visa.
The reason Youtube’s contribution to total surveillance and total thought control is now suddenly blowing up in their faces is because they are now suddenly attempting to do it with AI, and the Eliza illusion is now suddenly biting them.
Look up the meaning of the word “synecdoche”.
“It’s just about gay parades? How did I fail to notice that.”
Milo, in his recent interview with Tucker, goes into some detail of the high-status symbolism amongst the global elite for faggotry. Was also heartened to hear of his spiritual quest to remain celibate for God’s mercy. Saul became Paul, after all.
There is something childish and juvenile about Tucker. He very much acts like he is protected.
The Putin interview was cool though.
We live under a progressive regime that is chuthulian in nature. See how often he laughs like a madman? It isn’t childlike, it’s a man who hasn’t yet seen the light at the end of the tunnel and laughs in despair.
Com, enough with the anti-Tucker stuff. Even if you disagree with some of what he says, he has shown time and again that he represents real American values, not the values of hostile foreigners with tribalist agendas. His podcast is popular for good reasons, and it’s precisely that which so intimidates some ‘factions’ that have clearly decided to have him removed and silenced. I like you, but you always rush to defend the bad actors (who aren’t usually American at all) and denounce the real patriots. This is rather unpleasant.
Indeed they are: Tucker has done a lot of good work and deserves much credit, and however much they disagree with him for their particularist reasons, they should respect Tucker and not seek to silence/deplatform/assassinate him, as any American should be respected. In my opinion Tucker is a leading candidate–or one of the leaders–to inherit Trump after the latter’s presidency is over.
Here’s my plan:[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
To unkindly paraphrase your plan. Russia should worshipfully respect international borders so that the US can get away with continuing to massively violate international borders, including Russia’s, and continue to overthrow governments all over the world, possibly including Russia’s with no adverse consequences.
Globohomo has been poking the bear with a stick. If you poke a bear with a stick, does that mean the bear is entitled to eat you? I am sure you can present a fine and rational moral argument that being eaten is excessive, and morally wrong on the part of the bear, but you should not go around poking bears with a stick.
Americans need to understand that Russians are rationally afraid of the Globohomo empire, and therefore apt to do terrible things in order to attain safety. If we want to be safe, we need to make other nuclear armed powers feel safe, rather than pursuing a policy of threat, pressure, and intimidation.
Russia felt threatened because the US has repeatedly color revolutioned foreign governments, often bombing the target country flat in the process. Because Russia has no natural borders, Russia and Russians feel nervous when a hostile foreign power stations nukes on its borders. Russia and Russians would prefer to have neutral buffer states between themselves and an imperial foreign power that has repeatedly declared the intend of getting rid of Russia and liberating Russians from the oppressive Russian identity, whether those border states want to be neutral buffer states or not, and if it cannot make them into neutral buffer states, will make them into a desolate howling wilderness.
Because Russia has no natural borders, and a long history of terrible, bloody, and brutal invasions, Russia and Russians tend to be paranoid, and the Globohomo empire has done a lot to worsen their paranoia. Paranoid nuclear armed great powers are dangerous.
This is reminiscent of the events that led to world war one. Serbia had been making low level war on Austria, not-quite-war against Austria, and murdered the major authority in Austria who opposed making high level war on Serbia. Austria rationally felt it had to deter Serbia from making not-quite-war, by forcing them to choose between war and peace. They felt they had backed down too many times already, and had to settle the matter decisively. Serbia felt the same. Austrians rationally expected Serbians to back down. Serbians rationally concluded that they could not possibly back down.
Similarly, when in 2022 Russia demanded that Globohomo stop this stuff or else, Globohomo figured that Russia was bluffing, because Globohomo had crossed so many Russian red lines with no consequences. Russia was not bluffing, and the more crap the west throws at it, the angrier and more frightened Russia is going to get, the less likely it is to back down, and the more willing Russia is going to get to pay any price necessary in order to destroy its enemies.
[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*] Nobody was going to invade Russia, [*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
America nearly started World War III over Russian nukes in Cuba. Why should Russia not start World War III over US nukes in the Ukraine?
The conquest or destruction of Kaliningrad Oblast is regularly discussed and proposed in the US, as a step towards Moscow, despite, or because, of the presence of nukes in Kaliningrad. The erasure of the Russian language, identity and nationality by unspecified measures keeps being discussed in Europe. It is argued that it is is oppressive, and people need to be liberated from it.
Because of Russian history, it is not hard to spook the Russians, and this sort of talk would spook anyone. Color revolution in the Ukraine, and attempted color revolution in Georgia and Belarus, and more countries than I can shake a stick at would spook anyone.
The attack on Serbia would spook anyone. If borders are so sacred against Russia, why were the borders of Serbia not sacred against the US. If it is unthinkable to invade Russia, why was in thinkable to fund and arm proxies inside Russia, why is attack on Kalingrad a topic of discussion?
Is this a reply by Jim? Why is the comment handle different?
I keep accidentally mangling the handle because using a laptop with an unsatisfactory keyboard.
Kaliningrad Oblast is Prussia. And I mean Baltic Prussia, not Germanic Prussia.
The residents of Kaliningrad Oblast consider themselves Russian and like it that way.
The residents of Konigsberg were genocided by Stalin and replaced by ethnic Russians with the blessing of FDR and Churchill at Yalta.
Certainly a tragedy in human terms and certainly the communists were bad but if you start a total ancient antiquity style war of ethnic enslavement and extermination and then you lose you’re likely going to have very bad stuff happen to you.
“… if you start a total ancient antiquity style war of ethnic enslavement and extermination and then you lose you’re likely going to have very bad stuff happen to you.”
Hamas/Gaza learning this lesson now. not my fight and not shedding a tear for their “plight”
Yeah obviously they can’t live together. It just irritates me when people who say they are unironic Nazis wax moralistic about victor’s justice and victor’s revenge. Hitler was at least intellectually consistent about this in death when he supposedly said that the future belongs to the stronger people of the East.
But everyone who was wronged in that event is now dead, and reversing it would just wrong innocent people, not to to mention that those innocent people whom you so lightly propose to wrong have nuclear weapons.
Yes, Globohomo has gone off the rails, and should stop trying to topple governments around the world, particularly the Russian government, that possesses a very large nuclear arsenal. Globohomo should have listened in 2022, but as it’s run by idiots and demoniacs, did not heed the warning. So, should it fail to curb its misconduct, apt to suffer worse and worse retaliation for its violations of other nations’ sovereignty, particularly Russia’s.
American failure to curb Globohomo has back fired immensely, and Americans must realize that campaigns of psychological warfare against nuclear-armed Empires like Russia are horrible idea, that must never be carried out, or even considered. Mutual respect requires prosocial conduct, (and if a power imbalance is involved, all the more so,) with which Globohomo does not have a good track record. Globohomo should immediately cease all its anti-Russian operations, indefinitely, and start conducting itself respectably.
Russia is demonstrating on the battlefield that its immense terrible power is no bluff, and whoever had any such illusions before, very likely no longer has them. It’s also true that Russian paranoia is perfectly justified, and that this paranoia needs to be reduced by Globohomo arresting its cancerous expansion and subversion, and that should it fail to do so, Russia is justified in retaliation. If anyone remotely reasonable is still operating within Globohomo, they need to urgently tell their frothing anti-Russian “buddies” to cut it off, or else, and to stop playing rogue.
All Humans are Racist, as is all Life on Earth. So…
Racists? Fuck you, War!
https://x.com/GrageDustin/status/1993101991997059199
Successful Tribes always kept their Women away from other Tribes.
Tribes knew the answer to the WQ long ago, it wasn’t a question for them, it wasn’t a Feminist college course, it was Nature.
It’s not very difficult to convince an anxious hypochondriac kike that he has AIDS, rabies, a brain chip, high blood pressure, etc., so whoever is capable of doing all that is obviously talented, but it’s still shooting fish in a barrel. Anyways, I quit politics forever. Seriously. You’ve demonstrated your power, and I possess no desire or inclination to resist – now or ever. Thanks for the experience, though. I’m sure everyone has had as much fun as I did. And no, not “until next time.” I actually do raise the white flag here, forever.
And for God’s sake (I’m God, obviously. Lol), nuke this blog already.
Moss, you sound like you are getting unhinged from Internet poisoning. Just take a 100 day detox.
It seems this blog broke Mossad.
This blog is full of ideas that a lot of people in the modern world simply are not ready for.
To be able to even think clearly about some issues, one needs to be able to first examine one’s one predigested thinking.
Much of the current “elites” are highly propaganda programmed NPCs with no real sense of self, time, or intellectual ability. They live from moment to moment driven by immediate base needs. They don’t even realize the state they’ve been living in. They will never see the ideas of this blog until NYT decides it’s time to run a hit piece, and even then it will likely be highly distorted.
A follow-up to my previous comment: Some of the ideas the unready might encounter on this blog are not new, they are things that most people have always instinctively known to be true. The problem is the life-long conditioning many in the West have been subjected to, to pretend not to understand or believe those forbidden ideas.
…only to have the rabid Left now accuse everyone of believing those ideas anyway!
This is the most amateurish political document I have ever read.
(Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s hilarious environmental plan that mentioned “farting cows” is in the running, but I didn’t read that.)
Jim,
what is contradictory and confusing about a compromise? Diplomacy is like that…
Because the Russians are winning and the disparity is large enough the Kremlin expects to enforce an unconditional surrender at some point in the future. Also the last 3 agreements the west tore up when it was convient so the Russians will reject any promises that involve them walking on air.
The problem is not “compromise,” as you know damn well. The problem is that
(1) Most of the document is absurd. As just one example of many: “Both countries undertake to implement educational programmes in schools and society aimed at… eliminating racism.” Ah yes, eliminating “raaaaaaaaacism.” In other words, Russia agrees that its official state religion will be the leftist ideology that wants to exterminate all white people, including Russians.
(2) The entire thing is a set of promises from the international left, a group of people for whom promises mean absolutely nothing.
Cut the crap.
I get the feeling it’s one of the points to be traded away if needed. A la “If we have to remove this hugely important raaacism point, you’ll have to cede Crimea in return.”
This proposal is a classic example of anchoring, so Russia should probably just throw the whole thing out. (Note that previous and long-time Russian anchoring of certain points like denazification and so on seems to have been simply ignored.)
Funny thing is that even though Russia is holding all the cards, they’d still prefer a sub-optimal deal just to get this thing behind them. This whole plan following the ‘spontaneous uncovering of corruption of Zelensky’s close aides’ was no doubt intended by Trump to put pressure on Zelensky to do just that. But Zelensky is way too deep into a myriad of promises to deluded politicians and vicious mob bosses. Man couldn’t play straight even if he wanted too.
Residents of Kaliningrad will be asked to move voluntarily, if they don’t move voluntarily they will be moved.
It is obvious now that Russia has more shells, more artillery, and more drones. So how about instead Russia asks everyone in Lithuania and Estonia to move, and if they are disinclined to move, Russia moves them?
Also, Russia has nuclear weapons, and some of those weapons are stationed in Kaliningrad, with standing orders to use them if they are going to lose them. Thus attempting to move the residents of Kaliningrad involuntarily is going to lead to Lithuania and Poland being nuked, which solves the problem.
Is Kaliningrad really important to Russia? Are the Baltic States really important to NATO? Seems like both would benefit by an exchange.
Russia has been trying to attain a warm water port on the Atlantic for centuries, the major Western European powers have been trying to prevent it for centuries. Kaliningrad is part of that game. Russia gave up Lithuania and Estonia and Poland in return for guarantees that have not been honored. Kaliningrad was part of those guarantees, The logical course of action, regardless of what regime is in Moscow, is to eliminate them.
Either these guarantees need to be restored as part of a general peace settlement, or Poland, Estonia, and Lithuania are likely to be erased one way or another, sooner or later.
Is this fair to countries and peoples between Russia and the sea? Obviously not, but when elephants fight, the grass gets trampled. So if you don’t want to get stomped by the elephants, let goods and people pass through, and guarantee you will continue to let them pass through. Being party to a great power blockade of Russia makes you a belligerent, and small countries bordering one great power need to avoid becoming belligerents in conflicts between great powers. Their distant great power sponsor may well deem them expendable sooner or later, one way or another way. Lithuania, Estonia, and Poland, are on the front line in a conflict between great powers that has been running for centuries, which is not a healthy place to be.
Shill or butthurt belter?
Crypto is far more important than any blog.
World is filled with blogs, effectively never seen by anyone, and none have ever had any lasting impact.
The right crypto tool will be adopted by millions and have a massive impact.
Quit blogging.
Do crypto.
Which blogs are you thinking of? I see only a dead internet. ai slop, or controlled shill slop. I don’t see many places with authentic humans.
Putin will again murder innocent civilians on Christmas.
Murder gets one a non-optional appointment at the Gates of Hell.
As good a starting point as any for a longpost I wanted to share. Thank you, fellow white rightwing Christian mr officer sir!
Longpost choosing the proper place to settle in the Russian Federation in the 2020s.
*Structure*
The place is a federation with a congress and a senate, made up of 80+ states. Each of the states has a capital city, a supreme court, a bunch of ministries, a state university, an anthem, state TV, a local parliament and governor, a national guard, etc. This means 80+ state capitals, where the best infrastructure would be, including medicine, education, theaters, music, etc, but usually there are 3-4 other towns and cities in the state, which also provide what urban enjoyers need. Rule of thumb: over 50K population — should be fine. Under 50K — will need additional research; could be meh, could be an under the radar gem, could be a total shithole.
*Climate*
Geographically, roughly 80% of Russia’s climate is only fit for listening to Burzum while shooting up heroin. Most of this mix of taiga, tundra, and permafrost lies beyond the Ural mountain chain that separates European Russia from Asian Russia (Siberia), and to the north of St Petersburg, which is where Scandinavian/Arctic climes start to kick in for real. So: west of the Ural mountains, and south of St Petersburg is the sweet climate spot. This is all of the Central Federal District, most of the Volga Federal District, and above all, the Southern Federal District, but this last one comes with serious wog caveats, which are coming in the next paragraphs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_districts_of_Russia
*Demographic composition*
The states are four types: 1) oblasts; 2) krais; 3) federal republics; 4) autonomous regions. Oblasts and Krais are usually populated by a Slavic Christian orthodox population; the federal republics are populated by previously conquered nations; the autonomous regions are mostly populated by proto-amerindian aborigines — the descendants of those who didn’t cross into America across the alleged gargantuan ice brige 10 000 years ago.
The “federal republics” on the Caucasus mountains (the souther border of RF in the European part) are populated by macho swarthy natives, but a few of the “federal republics” within the European heartland itself, in the Volga federal region, are populated by fairly chill proto-Hungarians, proto-Bulgarians, and others, whose forefathers dropped out of the great migration back in the day, and instead of reaching for example Hungary proper, looked around and said “this here is good enough to settle”.
A mix of proto-Hungarians and Slavs populates Mordovia, Udmurtia and Mari El (all Christian, Mari El having a hefty local shamanic element), whereas proto-Bulgarians and their Turkic cousins populate places like Chuvashia (Christian), Bashkiria and Tataria (Mohhamedan).
*Safety*
There are whole states where the locals are descendants of generations of convicts, but that’s all in the Asian part (Siberia), so need not concern us.
In the European part, best to choose states that a) do not border other European countries, and b) do not have internal borders with fiery but mostly peaceful previously conquered non-Slavic peoples.
Thus oblasts Kursk, Belgorod, Voronezh, and Bryansk are out, since they border the Ukraine, unless one is willing to risk it. South Federal District oblasts Rostov and Krasnodar, border not only the Ukraine, but also other FR regions filled with robust mountain vibrants.
Therefore: solid heartland states with a normal climate and not bordering potentially risky neighbors. Oblasts: Vladimir, Ivanovo, Kaluga, Kostroma, Lipetsk, Oryol, Ryazan, Smolenks, Tambov, Tver, Tula, Yaroslavl, Kirov, Nizny Novgorod, Penza, Samara, Saratov, Ulyanovsk.
Acceptable federal republics: Chuvashia, Mordovia, Udmurtia and Mari El.
Copy and paste “прогулка улица” to youtube, combined with the name of the state, and there will always be some footage. Paste in the name of the capital or other city of RF state of choice, and check out the vibes.
Copy and paste “новости ИА” (news Infomormation Agency) combined with the state of choice, and you’ll get a link to the local state TV.
*Needed income*
The equivalent of how many dollars a month does one need to have a decent middle class life in the oblasts?
Russia is in fourth place in the world by GDP purchasing parity. The ruble is worth very little outside of Russia, and Russian heartland wages sound pitiful to western ears, but inside Russia provide access to goods and services that puts Russia in alleged fourth place, ahead of Japan, Germany, Britain, and France. Thus converting dollars or euro into rubles, to use inside Russia, can be enormously profitable.
The average salary is beloved by beurocrats, because it’s fake. The median salary is lower, closer to reality, and the modal salary, the lowest, is usually the true income of the population. However, we will simply use the *average* salary of each state as a basis of how much one needs for a decent middleclass lifestyle. It being a bit higher than reality on the ground is not the end of the world.
$900 a month (70 000 ru) and down: Smolenks, Mari El, Chuvashia, Ryazan, Vladimir, Tver, Lipets, Udmutria, Yarloslavl, Samara, Niznhy Novgorod
$770 a month (60 000 ru) and down: Ivanovo, Tambov, Penza, Mordovia, Kostroma, Saratov, Oryal, Kirov, Ulyanovsk
R&R: RF has mostly a summertime river and lake centric beach culture. Paste into youtube the word “пляж” combined with the state of choice, and you’ll see examples of the local river or lake beach culture.
The content here, that is, the dark enlightenment model of reality, should one day go into a version of ‘civilisation ii’, with good and bad tech trees. The ‘bad’ tech trees would be various historical manifestations of progress, which can be used for either a controlled burn or a rapid acceleration (attempting to destroy the world and then oneself in finite time), which perhaps brings about an early end times. Good score and a separate bad score to make the trees worth exploring on different play-throughs.
There is something called ‘freeciv’ but without even looking it at I assume a better engine is needed. Also, in the original civ 2, I like those 90s wmvs every time one built a great wonder such as the pyramids. Clipping together bits of history should really be done with a media content language pulling sources from a shared bucket, which is my current obsession anyway. The end result of a grand strategy game will be the dark enlightenment in a form that even children can take in.
The civ ii reality model, for the reference of unfamiliar readers, was that with mass democracy and universal suffrage, prosperity spirals upwards, leading to spiralling future technology (represented by windmills) to eventual godhood (alpha centurai ‘transcendence’ tech). In the new design these ideas become just familiar demons with changing names and justifications
I have always played the Civilization games with Monarchy or some such Government upward along those lines (like Fascism or whatever else it is called these days) which tend to support war and expansion. More fun to be hand. Never fond of Republic or Democracy or such limiting options which favour “scientific” or “cultural” victories.
Civ kinda sucks that way because Democracy is always the meta because even if you want to win militarily you win militarily because your military is more advanced then the other guy and in civ games you get more science as a democracy. If you play like Stellaris you only need to be a Democracy at the beginning but you can transition to a dictatorship or monarchy later…
Yes, the fundamental assumptions of the game make it unbalanced. Fun during early exploration stages but becomes a tiring grind later on.
The last Civ game I played was Civ vi which interested me with its new mechanics but ultimately I tired of it.
In Civ, democracy gives war weariness and low corruption. In real life, democracy results in frequent warfare, mass conscription, (as in Athens, Republican Rome, Revolutionary France, the World Wars,) and rather a lot of corruption. Low corruption is a racial characteristic, perhaps influenced by centuries of religious pressure. No doubt, the Civ war weariness mechanic was inspired by Vietnam but by that time America was already a ceremonial democracy, de facto a bureaucracy.
A neoreactionary civilization simulator would have the player wrestling with internal social forces as well as with competitors. Sure, you can emasculate the nobles by bringing them all to Versailles and turning them into useless fops, which will allow you to run your country directly and efficiently, but then your new bureaucracy may very well end up deposing your dynasty.
As I said in the other post, a realistic strategy game should have republics (if not imposed by a foreign power) bonuses upon adoption (one of which is the ability to more easily field a bigger military with the levee en masse early on with a much more negligible morale and social order penalty than say a monarchy would get imposing a levee en masse) which decay over time until it accumulates insane maluses and it should be hard to transition away from a republic .
Two other thoughts to get down before I forget:
1. Gene mapping, so statistical curves tracking distribution of alleles, producing long term outcomes at the gain/cost of short term, for example, enslaving a conquered population as opposed to slaughter. A similar map could even apply to spread of ideas. I recall the Israelites being told to commit slaughter in one case, which the Israelites ignored, and they ended up with mothers who taught their sons how to worship idols
2. While I only played a little of later civ (probably number 4), I actually liked the great man concept, one could get an Elon or Werner Von Braun popping up, you could even joke around with it by getting say, a baseball player, or a George Floyd that would trigger a riot. A big general achievement would be taking the concepts of sainthood, of heresy etc, which would exist in traditional forms early in the game (ancient and medieval) but showing how the concepts underneath continue to exist even as ideas mutate and progress
The military question is somewhat complicated. Early Rome had a lot of small landowners who weren’t too small and could therefore afford good arms and armor. This translated into far more armies than Rome’s Hellenic peer competitors could muster. Over the centuries, both population increase and natural consolidation of lands by the wealthy squeezed out this fighting middle class.
By the time we get to the World Wars, states are paying their soldiers. Civilization generates so much wealth and the state is sophisticated enough to siphon this wealth via taxation that it is available for state use. That’s not strictly a result of popular goverment. Germany under the Kaiser, for example, can muster huge armies too.
My opinion of a bad civ tech/culture tree is that there should be a social cohesion resource”Republics” should give temporary insane bonuses but burn through your social cohesion slowly at first but then at an expodentially higher rate and the bonuses should fall off and go negative as republics also accumulate bad but unchangable policies (it gets really bad when you hit “women’s suffrage” and “importing voters”) and your state will break into civil war (and you can’t easily transition out of a republic either). But in certain circumstances the early bonuses from adopting a republic should be worth the negatives down the line.
I’m trying to understand what specifically it is that I’m supposed to write/do. [*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
As specified in the the moderation policy, commit a thought crime, or criticise a thought crime in a way that clearly reveals what the thought crime is.
Perhaps you think you have already done so, and I missed it. If you think you have already done so, give me the date and time of the comment as this blog’s wordpress software perceives the date and time, and I will re-read and critique it. Or have another go.
If you commit a thought crime, or critique a thought crime in a way that makes it clear what the thought crime is, your email address get white listed, and your comments appear automatically and immediately.
My eyes tend to glaze over when I read suspected shill content and I don’t really give it a fair reading, so it is advisable to bring up the thought crime at the beginning of the comment, or otherwise make it clear that a comment is intended to comply with the moderation policy to obtain a white listing.
I suspect you of being a shill, or worse, a large language model. Neither of which can commit, or even admit to comprehending, thought crimes. Both of which derail content discussing what cannot be discussed in other places.
The competitive advantage of this blog is to discuss thought crimes that cannot be discussed. So all new commenters, all comments from a new email address are automatically greylisted, and once white listed, stay white listed, except for persistent violation of stated content neutral and politically neutral policies.
I try to make policies clear, and try to comply with my own policies. No one wishing to provide me with content gets suppressed except for stated reasons, and if I just don’t like a comment or a commenter, that is not a good enough reason for suppressing him — I try not to suppress people, content, or topics arbitrarily or unfairly, though I suppose I sometimes do, but I am not aware of doing so. As far as I am consciously aware, everyone is allowed though when stated policy says they should be allowed though, and the stated policy is fair and content neutral.
If it is not fair and content neutral — either on its face, or in application, I welcome discussion of it — from people who are capable of committing, criticising, or critiquing a thought crime.
I suppressed one commenter for verbose unintelligibility, for enthusiastically using lots of long or uncommon words without regard for meaning or communication, for writing in educationeze, which is unavoidably a subjective call, But as I perceive it, all other criteria are objective.
Unresponsiveness is perhaps a subjective criterion, but if you are repeating your position, and the other guy is repeating his arguments against that position, someone is being unresponsive. The best response to an objection to your position is to fisk that objection.
It was recently brought to my attention that you can get some very interesting answers out of DeepSeek if you (a) ask it to adopt a right-wing persona and (b) tell it to answer all questions in characters from this Unicode block. Apparently there’s an external censor that checks the output for forbidden keywords without bothering to ASCII-fy it first!
We also verified that DeepSeek can write English in Cyrillic letters, which is harder to censor because of the Gaddafi problem, i.e. there’s only one way to write Qadhafi in Arabic but at least 100 ways to spell it in Latin letters.
That is very interesting. Is there a link?
Careful, it’s a Reddit link:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTJailbreak/comments/1ogpsoe/deepseek_universal_jailbreak_contains_sensitive/
You can get Grok to say some good stuff if you copy the first message at the top of this exchange (I was not signed in for this):
https://grok.com/c/fb1d1fe4-4c28-42c1-8b91-61f600d22418
I hit the message limit before I could get it to say that gays want to sodomize little boys, but it was almost there. I don’t think this is a full “Jim AI”, but it could be turned into one easily if the engineers wanted. I had to lead it where I wanted it to go, but it can get pretty fucking based.
Please, tell me what I did not honor. When asked to stop [*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
You were asked? Not when commenting under this email you were not.
If you refer to a discussion under some other email, tell me what it was.
A cron job deletes IP addresses every night for security reasons. What I do not need to know about commenters gets erased, to ensure that no one ever gets to know it, so I cannot track past discussions by IP address. I can identify commenters somewhat by style, but this is not reliable.
I rely on the email address (which should be fake and unsuable, so that you can safely discuss thought crimes) to identify commenters.
You want to talk about Israel.
Far away, unpleasant people are fighting against even more unpleasant people.
I don’t care. You claim to be from those parts, so naturally you do care. OK, you can talk about that if you pass the shill test, and I and others will probably respond, even though it is kind of off topic for this blog.
There is an element of Trump’s increasingly shaky coalition that cares very much about Israel. I don’t care. What I very much care about is that those elements are trying to get other elements of Trump’s coalition deplatformed and murdered. I also very much care that they they are trying to suppress fundamental and foundational parts of Christianity in the United States, as discussed in my Easter articles.
Or as I put it, un-Christian people are doing extremely un-Christian things to each other. Reminds the audience that “human rights” is an entirely Christian concept, not universal at all.
The Christian notion is that you treat neighbors like neighbors, but if they’re not acting as neighbors it’s very much eye for eye, foot for foot, etc if not much more drastic.
Not only are ‘Human rights’ not universal, they are not inherently given. They are presupposed upon good behavior.
Pax,
How is the rank and file reacting to the video posted by the seditious-six?
Who?
Videos like that are aimed at top leadership. Rank and file are largely not tuned into political blathering like that from minor politicians. I’m not at the top, but I can only imagine with the Hegseth purges it wasn’t very effective. The junior officers and enlisted are still, for the most part, joking in good humor about getting deployed to LA or whatever, and Trump impressions are done in good humor and moral.
Those who believe that Putin is falling, falling, he has fallen, are dead wrong. Trump in particular is in great error whenever he assumes that Putin doesn’t hold power securely or that Russia can have terms dictated to it, and should keep his wild arrogance in check, and if he can’t, should step down from being President. The Maidan regime needs to go for peace to be possible, because the Maidan (+Azov) people are incapable of making peace and sticking to it. Ukraine is in no position to dictate any terms, given its dire condition, and must be prohibited (by any and all means) from joining Nato. Once Ukraine capitulates to Russia, who is winning on the ground, and sticks to officially recognized borders –recognized by Russia, most importantly– rather than seeking endless expansion, then progress towards prosperity will be made possible.
Not exactly a thought crime, but the proposition that the Maidan regime just has to go might be a thought crime, so allowing this through.
Not necessarily going to white list the next commenter that says the Maidan regime just has to go — we will see how this pass works out.
WQ thought crime:
Women are feral, blindly following ancient instincts from prehistoric times, which instincts tell them to cruise for rape by alpha male Chads, and to resist kicking-and-screaming all attempts to restrain them from pursuing alpha male Chads. If women are emancipated, Miss Average will waste her youth, her beauty, and her fertility fucking Mister One in Thirty, thus a people, a race, a nation, a faith, or an empire that emancipates women will perish for lack of families, leading to lack of sons. Men have to impose chastity on women with a stick.
_____
To clarify further, globohomo should stop messing around with Russia, and keep its homo to itself. Its agents and plants need to be kicked out for good. As for Maidan regime in particular, I don’t really see a scenario in which keeping it will be conducive to regional or world stability, so yes, it has got to go. In my opinion.
Even when properly owned, they make terrible decisions. I come home after long period of time in the field training. Find my tool box thrown away and all my tools stuffed in a cardboard box. She was ‘just doing some spring cleaning’. The tool box was quality American steel passed down to me dating back to my great granddad. I wasn’t even upset, had to show her how much harder it is to find the right tool when they are all in one giant pile. She didn’t get it. ‘Aren’t they (tools) all the same anyways’. Had to explain you can’t use a screw driver as a wrench. Blank stare. She is high IQ, but even then… and we let women vote.
Well, at least she didn’t through out the tools like I’ve heard some women do. My best buddy im the military just ran into that problem while fixing up his fiancee’s house in preparation for marriage. 🤣
That was a shit test dude, even I can see that. Should have slapped her across the room for trashing an heirloom, basically you showed her that her behavior during your absence will not result in consequences upon your return. Granted, it’s easier typing this on my keyboard than for you to actually look at your woman and do it
Yeah well, based on the circumstances involved, it was mostly my fault. There are things I found out I can ask a woman to do in my absence and expect good results, and then there are things I definitely don’t ask for, like take the car in for maintenance, or in this case put the tools away in my garage I had to leave in the open on sudden notice. She would have never gone and done that otherwise.
I don’t ask for things outside female capabilities anymore, and there has been no troubles since, but it was a rough (series of) lesson(s) for a young guy at the time.
I dunno, women are retarded across the board but I still have too high an expectation of them to see how one could mangle such a simple task without the cthonic instinct being a factor. Hopefully it is as you judge though.
Throwing away the toolbox seems like malicious compliance to me. And who cleans up by taking things out of the assigned container and leaving them in a pile? No no no, it’s a silent cry for strictly traditional sex roles in the household.
I would say all of the above.
She was told to organise stuff that she did not know how to organise, which naturally and justifiably pissed her off. She responded with malicious compliance and deliberate destruction, throwing out the valuable toolbox and destroying the existing organisation.
You fucked up by telling her to organise stuff she could not organise, and you fucked up, failed a shit test, which is always has terrible consequences, by not giving her a spanking for throwing out your valuable toolbox.
When you explain why the toolbox is valuable and needed, and she responds with bored incomprehension, she wants you to slap her face and tell her to pay attention, and your failure to do so is likely to have consequences.
That incomprehension of male stuff is genuine. The bored incomprehension is a standard shit test.
So initially you fouled up by asking for a task to beyond female competence to be performed unsupervised, to which she responded with a serious shit test, which you then flunked disastrously, for which failure there are likely to be consequences.
There is no rest for men. We must always perform for women.
Agreed, it is my lived experience that women just have no idea about what tools are good for or how to manage your garage or the like. (Their useful outdoor activities may, however, include gardening.) So unless you’re married to Sydney Sweeney, well-known mechanic, you should organize accordingly.
Also, just a reminder: don’t give them physical tasks that a pre-pubescent boy of age 11 or 12 couldn’t be relied on to accomplish. That’s about how strong they actually are.
Trump’s stance on Russia has been the biggest disappointment of his second term imo. Cozying up to Al Nusra being the runner up.
Granted, he and JD yelled at Zelensky in the oval office, they paused weapon shipments a few times, then had Europe pay for arms instead of giving them away, even met with Putin in Alaska. Unthinkable under Kamala.
But he simply refuses to realistically assess the situation on the ground and he’s still beholden to NATO, so the US can’t make any moves towards actually ending the war.
Pet conspiracy theory of mine is that sometime mid-2024, the neocons came to Trump and said “We’ll support any and all of your domestic policies and most of your foreign policies. The only thing we want in exchange is for weapons to keep flowing to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan.” And Trump replied with “Deal!”
This explains why so many prominent neocons went from RINOs to ostensibly hard-core Trumpists almost overnight. Most obvious examples are Rubio and Lindsey Graham. But you even see more minor figures like Randy Fine and Drew Pavlou posting like they’re in 2017 frogtwitter. Makes me think the whole thing is coordinated.
>the US can’t make any moves towards actually ending the war.
The appropriate measures in the right hands can finish any job.
And time is running out for Ukraine.
Except we’re not getting the kind of deportation numbers we need. If Trump had a free hand in domestic policy I would like to see 10x the deportation numbers the revocation of all or nearly all H1B/OPT visas and basically a ban on immigration from the subcontinent.
Indeed, if Trump were willing to solve the problem for the long-term or permanently, he would follow up on all that without delay.
As soon as humanely possible!
Well of course the whole thing was coordinated. That was obvious to me several months before Trump 2.0 was elected. And I said the fix was in before the election, retracting my previous gloomy predictions. The only question I did not know was what was the shape of deal.
And it is shaping up to be a very bad deal. Albeit a whole lot better deal than the entire Trump family being Epsteined in prison, which was probably the alternative if he refused to take the deal.
But at some point, the Maga part of the Trump coalition is going to have to change the deal on our increasingly obnoxious allies, or we are all going to get killed, save for those of us that have already fled the Global American Empire or made adequate escape preparations.
Well, in fairness to Trump, we are witnessing the most effective rightist administration since like Eisenhower. Border is actually secured, USAID got taken out, 2M deportations and the first negative net migration in 50 years, 100k charge on new H1Bs, National Guard cleaning up cities across the country, historic tariffs reorganizing global trade to benefit America, DOGE made 200B in cuts, Supreme Court ruling with Trump 90+% of the time, TPS just got rescinded for Haitians, etc. Trump is on the ball.
And yet, we all know in our hearts that it’s not enough and that dems can undo it all. Trump II is simultaneously beyond our wildest dreams and a nagging disappointment.
Exactly so.
To make the counter revolution permanent, far more drastic measures are needed, among them, to repeal the nineteenth amendment, without which repeal an outcome vastly worse than Contaminated NEETs gloomy predictions is likely.
NEET’s predictions are in error due to normality bias. He predicts Biden normality. Not likely. Going to be vastly worse, or vastly better, or both — dreadful bloodshed followed, after considerable delay, by vastly better.
I remain hopeful and optimistic about Trump II. Domestic deployments only make sense if seen as trial runs for insurrection act, and trial runs, much like nuclear testing, are required to avoid the really bad outcomes that would result in pushing the button and finding out it doesn’t work. Pentagon leadership is being cleaned up by the Honorable SecWar Hegseth, and I see big changes have happened and continue to happen with every new MARADMIN issued.
Bondi’s DOJ-BATF (Trump’s Lil Darlin), actively sabotaging Trump’s 2A.
Though Trump was a NYC Democrat who never was much of a 2A, quite flip-floppy, until his Sons or someone gave him the basics (perhaps on how not to lose to a marauding mass of Leftists hell bent on violent Colour Revolution).
https://www.gunowners.org/
https://x.com/GunOwners/status/1993057070460158104
https://x.com/GunOwners/status/1991869208074781079
Gun Owners of America is asking our members to call the White House. Please urge President Trump to force Pam Bondi and the Justice Department to stop fighting GOA and instead to work with us to overturn gun control and restore the Second Amendment.
The GOA has been described by Congressman Ron Paul as “The only no-compromise gun lobby in Washington.” This quote from Paul is displayed on the home page of the Gun Owners of America website. Paul was the only 2008 presidential candidate to receive an A+ grade from Gun Owners of America.
You know who else has a twenty eight point peace plan?
Tzeentch.
CIA Election Colour-Rev Source-Code News
https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson
https://x.com/FlaHustla/status/1993781859109712362
https://x.com/ElectionWiz
https://www.kunstler.com/p/coupcoup-birds
News, if you’re into conspiracies that is.
We approach invocation of the insurrection act with every new deportation. @TC and all the naysayers who say Trump hasn’t been hard enough on the migration question. We are getting there, but for good reason, we’ve had trial runs with domestic deployments before full sending.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trumps-third-world-immigration-ban-precursor-insurrection-act
Yarvin has long brought up a very good point about drug abuse that completely changed my views from the libertarian stance I held for decades. During the Vietnam war, our military used all sorts of drugs while overseas, and there were serious concerns they would bring their habits home with them… Turns out, if there is no domestic market, they quickly stop.
I see no reason why we should therefore allow the continued flow of drugs across the boarder that is shitting up our streets, and I see no reason why we should continue to be blase about public degeneracy. Broken windows theory is no fallacy. Lock them all up. Safe, clean streets are a mark of civilization and Singapore with its death sentence for smugglers and harsh prison times for use is a far more civilized nation state than any current American jurisdiction. By all means we should emulate them.
https://x.com/NiohBerg/status/1994066652237869545
“””One thing I will never understand is why so many right wing accounts here (X) think Russia is a “trad and based Christian nation”. Russia has the largest Islamic population in Europe, with so many privileges given to Chechnya and other Muslim regions. At least Ukraine is Christian.”””
https://x.com/its_The_Dr/status/1993493925051744271
Females should not be let out of the house without Male escort, else Demons infest them and they turn into this.
https://x.com/pr0ud_americans/status/1993303685934596197
Swalwell gets his tranny ass reamed by a Negress.
https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1993698832337580225
Let the Imports tell you what they’re really doing here, because your Politicians are lying to you. Of course the Muslims and Jews are also doing far more than just this.
https://x.com/realMaalouf/status/1994009073642029384
Muhammad was the first Gay Muslim, a number of records hint at his Homosexuality.
https://x.com/VividProwess/status/1993432003325161677
The Flattening… coming soon to Dearborn, London, Malmo, and other formerly fine Western cities… FAFO.
https://x.com/IslamInvasion/status/1993295353333137648
Noni Darwish speaks out about the fight now present in your lands.
The West is now facing three terrible Demons, the traitor Politicians and evil Globalists who conspired to ship in the Imports, and if you’re able to wipe them out and regain control, then the Imports themselves.
An Islam Muslim shot two Guard in DC.
More will have to die before sufficient public rage is generated necessary to permanently evict the problem by final means as may be needed.
https://x.com/BasilTheGreat/status/1993356525641797872
https://x.com/ACTBrigitte/status/1993217881975537844
https://x.com/VividProwess/status/1993218093032800549
https://rumble.com/v1socf0-pbd-podcast.html
Patrick Byrne on PBD
Your comment is a long, long, long, list of Mohammedans proudly telling us that they are stabbing us from in front, but I do not think Jews stabbing us from behind is a huge improvement.
The reason so many people view Russia trad and based Christian nation is because its state religion is Christianity, rather than sodomy, sexual transition, mass migration, and Covid, and its Christianity is Christianity, rather sexual equality and sodomy.
Equal opportunity re all stabbers coming from any direction.
West doesn’t need any Jews, Muhammaden, Browns, Asians, Blacks, Gays/Trannies/Lesbians/Feminazis, Leftists, Marxists, Socialists, Communists, Democrats, BLM, Antifa, USAID, Worshippers/Harborers/Breeders of Evil/Demonology, Democracy.
Plenty of all that already elsewhere, and already Failed.
No need to let the Globalists and Politicians Create and Import more of it everywhere.
Nor does it need in its midst and lands any Failures to Integrate… ie: active intentioned refusal to *ADOPT* and *BECOME* generally White-type Christian-type English-type Western-type… the insistence upon seeking out only those from where they came, upon remaining exclusive and creating No-Go Zones, and upon *REMAINING* that from which they came, upon forbidding and preventing themselves from ever Adopting and Becoming, upon promulgating that from where they came upon where they are.
Importing those, granting any “Permanent Status” especially “Citizenship by Birth” and “Naturalization without having become Naturalized”, to them… never does any good.
Never did, does not, and never will.
It always and universally results in incompatible auto-segregation, undermining, political factioning, more civil wars, and takeover by whichever subset agglomerates more Power… whether Politicial, Financial, Breeding.
Suicidal Empathy, the foolish notion to begin and continue letting in the Other’s/Anti’s, this kills your Heritage and Civilization every single time.
There was generally a State Religion for 1500 years or so called Christianity… largely in form of Catholicism organized by the Popes, adopted by States via Kings and by the People via congruence with the Book. Also the various Orthodoxy, and later even Protestant was well formed as to its central views if not so much an organized entity and single practicum.
A functional State Religion would NEVER allow any of the above unneeded, known detrimental, Other/Anti elements, in by the Millions let alone Thousands, to run Street Takeovers spewing their opposing Religion/Politic out into the Public, never allow to “Elect” them to Political Office, never allow them to build Massive Religious Buildings/Networks/Finance structures that serve as Active Military Bases from which to Conquer you from Within.
Instead a functional State Religion would…
0) Recognize the perpetual threat of the opposing Forces, never forget it, teach their children about it and how to always ward/fend it off
1) Never let them in at all
2) Push them all out
3) Only Temporarily allow in, without granting any Rights, only the absolute minimum number necessary to effect cross-border Trade, Diplomacy, and some Genetic DNA diversity.
4) Work to continually diminish the now purely external threat
States that forget and fail to perform those basics, among other basics, do nothing but contribute to their own demise and conquerment.
While Russia may have declared a “State Religion” just as any State declares itself to have a “Motto/Flag”… its State Religion is NOT functional as defined above. Proof of such non-function is clearly evidenced in the takover documented in the first video above. As well as in the obvious number of Gay Sodomizers, Femenazi, and incompatible non-integrators now let in and granted full Rights… amassing themselves in the Russian cities. Russia even allowed the COVID Hoax. Though to its credit (or not) it did try to develop its own COVAX instead of using the Globalist one.
Popes turned Corrupt, Gay, and Woke… and now they’ve full ported away from non-Secular matters of the Faith, into being Politicians, indistinguishable from any other Secular Politician functionary of the Corrupt and Fallen Western Democracies.
But if it’s {{{JEWS}}} that people want to talk about, here’s one particular Black Rimmed Thick Glasses wearing JEW that nowhere near enough people are talking about disassociating and ejecting from Political Power in your land, from Jewry in your land, and from Residency in your land itself (nevermind that his giddy-selfish-unrepentant-partner-in-Holocaust father scammed his sneaky Jewish non-integrating way into the USA via the “Suicidal Empathy” programme of “Linked Citizenship” via “Marriage”, upon which he promptly continued evermore fuckery over the West)…
https://x.com/BowesChay/status/1994479242906931673
Speaking of Black Glasses wearing Jews, Kissinger was obviously of no-better result too, thus further proving never needed in the first place.
World remains somewhat versed in the ongoing JQ, but ever since the failure of the last Crusades to solve the IQ, the world had somehow completely forgotten the IQ, so now the IQ is obviously coming back into as ill effect as the ongoing JQ, Left Q, WQ, and all the other Q’s are.
Islam is not some harmless Religion/Faith, their Clothes/Manner of Piety and list of “same” Angels/Prophets/Stories are a Trojan Horse for and cover up Islam’s sinister murderous-invasion-conquerment intent against all non-Muslims (unlike say the Amish).
The Power of the Internet is that it is exposing all the Q’s in an agnostic fashion for all who care to see.
Which Globalist Colour-Rev PsyOp fuckers funded all this Demonic Gay Pedo Lefty parade full of shit?
https://x.com/BowesChay/status/1994787556060533113
Was it this one?
https://twitter.com/rajshah/status/1992977245451768125
Or this one?
https://www.facebook.com/reel/826882020239092
Or this one?
https://beneathsheepsclothing.movie/
Or which Globos, Pols, Elites, and BlackRims exactly… ???
Solutions usually begin with identifying the exact problems and their source malactors.
Often counter narratives exist to whatever befalls…
https://tandirection.com/enemies-of-salvation/escape-from-communism-the-bella-dodd-conversion-story/
https://www.heritage-history.com/index.php?c=read&author=johnson&book=color&story=_front
https://newdiscourses.com/2024/10/the-basics-of-cultural-marxism/
I do not see any gay pedo sodomy in this parade. Looks all OK to me.
What on earth are you talking about.
Zero Trad Americana allowed in this parade of horrors fantasy.
All replaced by manufactured Hollywood Messaging characters, short-lived mind-numbing cartoon chars, video games, weird ghoulishness, and some sort of bizarre “Santa” sleigh with a token black woman and a likely gay hispano-asian looking mutt in it.
Snoopy was there (but re-memed and less than half former size), same for Smokey held tiredly.
In at least this clip, apparently no US Flags, American Military Men on Mil Trucks, big corporate floats, high school marching bands and gymnasts, Businessmen, random Irish/Italian floats, Fire Depts, Thanksgiving Turkeys, retired Rotary and War vets, Catholics/Bishops, Pilgrims, not even a nice float full of sexy primarily white american women.
Pull up a parade from the early 80’s.
Notice the total erasure of all the necessary mainstays of cultural/civilizational survival and permanence.
Some very Dark Forces obviously did that, and lots of weak cucks allowed it.
Speaking of Manufactured and NYC…
https://x.com/Disclaimergate/status/1994887605515633138
Welcome to the eternal cycle of history. Good times created weak men, and those weak men (tradcuck boomers) are now creating hard times. We’ll eventually get to the stage where hard times create strong men, but not until millions are starving to death and being murdered for the meat on their bones.
While not exactly the most high-brow of cultures, floating giant shrek is much preferable to essentially every gay pride parade.
Alf, I just barred a huge range of IPs from attempting to login. If, in the next few days, you are unable to login, let me know in the comments.
Will do. Just tested logging out and in, so far everything’s working on my end.
Listen to the Imports, the Let-In’s, and the Illegals, most of them are not really in the West to BECOME Western and thus truly Integrate… they are merely Economic Tourists and Freeloaders, whose real loyalty and remittance remains foreign. And in the case of of Islam, to Invade and Conquer, and in the case of Jewry to Contort to Advantage.
https://x.com/KarluskaP/status/1994572994711359686
One could make an hour long montage of 30 second Disloyalty/Anti clips like this.
Once any Alien population in your lands reaches above a very small fractional percent, they lose the natural incentive to Integrate to Survive, and shift into the mode of seeking out their own and multiplying as a separate and active Mass thereafter.
Understanding Nature helps one master Nature in ways that will help you prevent and/or restore from being overrun my the Wilds of Nature.
Do we even want them to integrate and truly become us? That changes us. Look at Latin America. Hell, look at the what those sainted Ellis Islanders, who came over with 15 cents in their pockets and big dreams in their heads, did to the good old USA. Brazil Norte is not a win condition.
> Do we even want them to integrate and truly become us?
Never said that, did say they’re all unneeded and should gtfo, many times.
> missing… democracy has failed
Said that, many times.
> Brazil … Ellis
Brazil’s Imports and Let-In’s trended a bit more Brown/Black, than your average Irish/Pole/Italo/Germ/Franco/Spaniard/Slav/Rus/Greco/Euro type Ellis’er, so cutting some slack for those white-types coming over.
“Suicidal Empathy” really got started post-1989, and went into total Suicidal Overdrive with the Muslim Imports from Iraq-1 through Today. Of all the Imports and Let-In’s, the Muslims are going to be the biggest problem… major Incompatibility, and Civilizational Conflict going to happen with them.
It’s also got real fucking bad with Trump insisting on putting all these Jews, and Women, into his admin.
Not much worried about the Catholic Hispanics with Families.
Though the psychotic Idol worshipping pre-Columbian Aboriginal ones definitely want to kill you, so you can leave those out too.
Negroes never amount to anything, all of them were completely unnecessary.
Chinks just steal your tech and info and leave, would have been better to “Save the Universities” by sending White American kids there.
The 80’s-90’s Jap contingent was kinda fun.
Hindus… kinda harmless, but just as annoying and non-integrating as all the rest.
So why bother with any of them.
Should have locked them all out, and bred your own instead.
Like most of your comments, this is already well-known here. There’s nothing objectionable about your saying it, but in this particular forum it is like carrying coals to Newcastle.
If you are a shill – there’s a shilly vibe to your comments – you should know that your payload is not having any effect, at least for me, because my eyes glaze over and I just skip down to the next person’s comment.
Yes, I see a whole lot of shill characteristics in SkipRamen’s posting.
What he is shilling, however, is the need for Maga to take radical action. Which on this blog is carrying coals to Newcastle. The shill characteristics indicate an identical payload is being dumped on every right leading blog, regardless of the nature of the blog, the community, and the existing threads of discussion.
Which is irritating, but he is not an enemy shill, so likely to pass any thought crime test we throw at him. But he is still being unresponsive.
What is missing from his tedious shilling is that democracy has failed. For a long time we have been electing uniparty politicians who carry out the same program regardless of their nominal party platform, and Trump 1.0 was the public response for that. Instead of the people dissolving the old government, and electing a new government, the government dissolves the old people and elects a new people — a complaint that is, by the way, over a century old. Democracy is the final state of a degenerating Republic. As used to be known, a Republic can only work with a virtuous people and a virtuous elite. It is great while it lasts, but it eats social capital and produces a degenerate and wicked people and elite, and then dies in a horrible manner.
Probably the Republic could keep on going for a little while longer if we took the vote away from the illiterate, from people on public assistance, and from women, de-emancipated women, replaced our officially unofficial demonic state religion with officially official Christianity and legalised marriage 1.0, but hard to get there without temporarily suspending the Republic, after the style of Sulla. Sulla failed because the state religion continued to be degenerate and wicked, and became more degenerate and wicked. But it worked for a little while, and, done right, could have worked for considerably longer.
None of the revolutionary seizures of power during the fall of the Roman Republic addressed the Woman Question or the State Religion, hence failed to restore Roman greatness. But they nonetheless accomplished quite a lot.
Trump has unilateral power to declare the insurrection act, which makes him dictator until he cancels it or his term is up. The left correctly see, and Maga officially denies, that the use of federal troops to clean up blue cities is warm up for the insurrection act. The left is warming up for civil war against an insurrection act president.
Very clearly said. Yes, we are nearing the end, the left knows this apparently. Many on the MAGA side seem to have normalcy bias believing Trump will somehow save society.
It is too late… We must prepare ourselves for the inevitable fall. You will need transportation, provisions, and weapons. Get everything now, while you still can.
It still amazes me, even though in an intellectual sense I’ve known it for decades. The thing that gets me is Why? I still don’t get it, at an emotional level. I understand why the haute left, who assume they’ll avoid any violence, would want to manipulate their foot-soldiers into trying this. But what is so important to the foot-soldiers, that they’re willing to risk their lives over it? Infinite gays and trannies? “Environmental” laws that force you to eat maggots you find in the dirt to stay alive? For that stuff, you’re not only willing to fight, but you’re willing to risk getting shot and bleeding out in the street? I would fight to avoid that stuff. To fight for it is… words fail.
Some men just want to watch the world burn
Why?
They think it’s the right thing to do and it’s the winning side. “Doing well by doing good,” as they used to say. I know these people. I work with them and I socialize with them in my spare time.
You put “environmental” in scare quotes and give a hyperbolic scenario about grubbing for maggots in the dirt. To them, it’s a matter of the survival of mankind. Everyone will die horribly of starvation (probably after desperately digging up and eating insects), disease, and war if we don’t significantly curtail our lifestyles. You find the gays and trannies ridiculous. To them, it’s the Civil Rights struggle of our time (and it goes without saying that Civil Rights was the greatest accomplishment in American history). They’re the kind of people who would save Anne Frank (or so they imagine), so they are saving suicidal trans kids from your deadly heteronormativity. Children are dying, and you stubbornly and senselessly refuse to say an unfamiliar pronoun to save them. We have all been subjected to the greatest propaganda machine in all human history, and it has worked its magic on all of us, but some more than others.
Meanwhile, every power center in America rewards Progressivism and punishes Reaction. Being too Left-wing will never hurt your career. At worst, you’re an idealistic dreamer: purer, kinder, and smarter than the smug lib nomenklatura who holds your destiny in her hands; maybe a little silly, but ultimately harmless and even praiseworthy. Too Right-wing, though, and employing you is a crime. Even conservatives operate this way. No enemies to the left, no friends to the right. It doesn’t take a Machiavelli to figure out the smart move here.
And yet the definition of the right thing to do has been changing with alarming speed, ever faster, with speed ever more alarming.
Having a theory of the right thing to do that enables you to do well by destroying your near enemies comes in mighty handy.
Coming up with a theory of why it is right to knock down some applecarts and grab some apples has been working, so more people do it, and do it harder, and when one set off applecarts is destroyed, they eye some more applecarts, which is why leftism has no essence, except smashed applecarts and rolling apples. What leftism is, is ever changing.
The cynicism is obvious: Caring so deeply for black criminals implies not caring for their mostly black victims. Similarly, the destruction of marriage, socialism, covidianity, and mass migration.
So “doing good” gets endlessly and abruptly redefined as what enable them to do well.
The smart move is to be in the vanguard in smashing the next applecart, though it is not always clear which one is up next, so we always have a multitude of competing redefinitions of what it is to be the leftmost.
But obviously this has to end eventually. And the further it goes, the more cataclysmic the ending.
The end state of leftism is that everyone tortures everyone else to death for being insufficiently left, the Seven Kill Stele. But usually something happens before the ultimate end state is reached.
> Black piller
You ignored my question. You said that leftism is the “smart move,” e.g. “Being too Left-wing will never hurt your career.” But what I asked was, With impending civil war, why would the foot-soldiers risk getting shot and bleeding out in the street?
The watching the world burn thing is more plausible.
Contaminated Neet has normality bias. He cannot imagine a situation where being left means going out in the street and catching bullets.
And, indeed, the left cannot really imagine that situation either. If they could, they would not be the left.
The left figure on conscripting legacy Americans to go out and die for them. Which they might well manage, but this is looking a whole lot chancier than it previously did.
Contaminated Neet says cops will obey orders. I have some personal experience of this. They will obey orders they don’t agree with, but very inefficiently and ineffectually. Most cops are good men doing a dangerous job, and when obeying evil orders, will run dead with them. We saw this happen in one of Musk’s coups against the ngos.
In 1941 Russia was falling to the German advance, because Stalin had demoralised the people, the army, and the military officers. With the Germans not very far from Moscow, he went up on stage and did a massive U turn ideologically, identifying himself with past Tsars, and cutting a favorable peace deal with Orthodoxy.
Stalin had already been implementing Thermidorean policies in practice, but had been smothering Thermidorian practice with full dress Marxist ideology, concealing what he was doing from people, the party, and perhaps from himself. On stage, with German troops in sight of Moscow, went full Thermidorian, which saved Russia. Without that U turn, the Russian army would have continued to obey orders in the way that I have experienced police obeying orders.
>You ignored my question.
I guess I wasn’t clear on what your question is. What do you mean by “foot soldiers?” Functionaries enforcing Leftist policies on a recalcitrant public? Antifa rioters executing deniable state-sanctioned violence against the kulaks? Uniformed soldiers fighting for a Leftist faction in a hypothetical hot civil war?
What do you mean by “risk getting shot?” Putting on a uniform and marching into literal battle? Or bringing the USA closer to hot civil war through Leftist political activity?
If the question is why would someone fight in a Leftist army or militia in a hypothetical American civil war, that’s easy. Same reason most men in most armies fight: someone in authority tells them to, and then once they’re in battle, they fight for the guys next to them.
If the question is why would someone likely to be conscripted into fighting in a hypothetical American civil war advance Leftist policies and ideas that make such a war more likely, that’s also easy. No one person’s Leftist activity is likely to push America into civil war, but he is very likely to reap immediate individual benefits from it. It’s ridiculous to think that any one Leftist act is going to be spark that starts the fire, but it might get you laid, or get you into an influential professional clique, and it will certainly make you feel both virtuous and powerful. The benefits are immediate and individual, while the costs are vague, distant, and uncertain.
I’d also point out that there is no hot civil war. No Leftists are getting shot and bleeding out in the street, and even Rightists are only getting shot and bleeding out in the street in vanishingly small numbers. Maybe someday things will escalate, but so far, that just brings down the full weight of the state on the Leftist side. Leftist violence is an understandable excess of commendable zeal. Rightist violence is an unspeakably serious crime that must be rooted out at all costs. Getting shot and bleeding out in the street is not currently a real concern for Leftists. Maybe that will change, but it hasn’t yet.
The pattern that the left habitually uses is the police protect the antifa, BLM, etc, and these nominally non state organisations then deploy state sanctioned violence.
But when things get real, when actual fighting ensues, the police protection will prove strangely ineffectual, and antifa will run for cover.
Recall Kyle Rittenhouse. He rolled up the police, said he had shot some rioters in self defense, the mob behind him complained of him killing some rioters, and the police suffered strange blindness and deafness.
Now, imagine similar events, except plausibly legimate authority is sending forces in to maintain order. Again, recall what happened when things got physical during one of Musk’s ngo coups. The Ngo called the blue state cops, who despite being under blue state orders, did not play ball.
Leftist escalation hinges on the left believing that, when push comes to shove, they’ll make the other side bleed out on the street. If they think they can get away with it, they will try to get away with it.
I think Antifa basically won the large scale street fight on points back then, mostly by being better organized and better prepared (including having the authorities on their side, but not only that). Somewhat embarrassing.
Organised violence beats unorganised violence. The right was coercively prevented from organising. The Proud Boys etcetera were honeypots run by the FBI, while Antifa are directly run by Democrat NGOs.
>black piller
Antifa rioters going up against the US military. You’ll recall that I referenced Jim’s comment “The left is warming up for civil war against an insurrection act president.”
Exactly that.
Again, “The left is warming up for civil war against an insurrection act president.” One of the more annoying things leftists do is pretend they are unable to read when it suits them.
>Antifa rioters going up against the US military.
Ah, OK. So it’s completely moronic. There is zero chance of antifa rioters going up against the US military. They’re not willing to get shot doing that. There’ll be plenty of propaganda kabuki play-fighting, but the second it comes to a real battle, antifa will melt away. It won’t come to that, though, because they’re both on the same side. Antifa is an arm of the state, used for tasks where the state prefers plausible deniability. The military will either back them up, or at worst, stand aside and allow them to do as they please. If the Right could through some miracle get the military on side, there would be no civil war: it would be a coup and it would be over in a matter of days.
Obviously Pete Hegseth is not on the same side as antifa, and he now seems to have a loyalist chain of command between him and the grunts, with the enemies being sidelined or purged.
The military is ninety nine percent obese logistics and a cancerous and ever growing logistics bureaucracy, who do not matter when the army steps into politics, and Pete Hegseth has secured the small part of the military that actually does matter.
Ice is obviously loyalist, is being massively and rapidly expanded, and when antifa backed by cops besieges an Ice facility, Ice comes down on them.
Pax Imperialis has the inside info. He told us that the military was in the hands of enemies, and this has now been substantially fixed. He was being purged, and is now unpurged, which tells us who is now being purged. OK, logistics is still in the hands of a bunch of foreign alien commies who want to murder all legacy Americans, but with tip of the spear loyalist, they are going to shut up and comply.
Pete Hegseth is not in charge of the military. Pete Hegseth will be lucky if he gets out of this with his life and his freedom.
If Pax Imperialis has been unpurged and rehabilitated, we have the tip of the spear.
Pete Hegseth is nominally in charge of the entire military, and is in fact in charge of the part of the military that actually matters. We have loyalists, or at least men willing to go along with the new regime, all the way down the chain of command from him to Pax Imperialis.
FBI is completely under the control of the raving lunatic left, and it has been that way since forever. When the spies that stole the nuke secrets for Russia were outed, the FBI had to be dragged by the scuff of the neck kicking and screaming the whole way to arrest them, and the DoJ needed to have their arms twisted to breaking point to prosecute them. The FBI rank and file are mostly OK, but to restore sanity in the FBI we would need men willing to purge the entire chain of command. Purge them all the way to re-education camps in Alaska.
Today, the FBI is still raving lunatic frothing at the mouth left, and the DoJ is RINO. But Ice is solid, and the tip of the military spear is solid. When the time comes to declare the insurrection act, the DoJ will get Jacksoned with the judges.
Someone is a complete moron here. Let’s see if we can figure out who!
You dismiss a scenario that happens all the time. Leftists put plausibly innocent-looking people on the front lines and set up confrontations such that the good guys have to either back down, or shoot/tear gas/etc. them, thus leading to weepy media propaganda about their horrible murderous fascism. (Cf. the recent photo of a “pastor” being pepper-balled by ICE.) Not only does this happen, it is part of the standard color revolution playbook. The left has been doing it here in the United States for years, and has intensified it since Trump 2.0 started. At least some of them believe that doing it against the military will only involve minor variations on the basic theme. They might be wrong about this – it remains to be seen – but that’s what they think.
Color revolution is intended to culminate in an entirely one sided civil war. It is preparation for civil war, followed by actual civil war.
And as people have gotten wise to the tactics, it has become more and more likely to culminate a civil war that is not entirely one sided.
> Pete Hegseth is not in charge of the military. Pete Hegseth will be lucky if he gets out of this with his life and his freedom.
STFU about Pete. Pete is the best man we’ve got among a very small crew that does not necessarily include Trump.
If Pete waxed foreigns running drugboats into my land, great, I’d rather legalize and produce known clean shit domestically for top-shelf sale at the cheapo supermart anyways, no more street thugs that way, thank God.
Pete’s got his probs, but I’ve got his back on those.
If SHTF and Pete and crew say jump, I’m asking “How High, Ser!”.
SkipRamen, its obvious that you are a shill, but since you are a Maga shill, I figured you could pass any thought crime test I could throw at you. But your recent comment proclaiming yourself more right wing than thou pissed me off mightily, so I threw a thought crime test at you — which you have failed.
I asked you: Whites are going extinct through failure to reproduce. What is causing failure to reproduce? What needs to be done about this? And what do we say is causing it and needs to be done about this?
The answer to this question is given in the moderation policy, and also is stated all over the place in this blog, most recently in https://blog.reaction.la/culture/what-women-want-2/ and in the many other blog posts that it links to.
Because you have not answered, putting you on moderation, and I am going to silently delete, or unkindly edit, all your comments, until you answer.
> thus leading to weepy media propaganda about their horrible murderous fascism.
This is why any good revolution dismantles the Leftist Media and Propaganda Machine first, then you have free reign to do whatever else needs done, and broadcast whatever you want.
> But your recent comment proclaiming yourself more right wing than thou
In my certain ignorance, I’m not seeing that, I see a fair comment and suggestion being made given the not good circumstances.
So whatever do you refer to exactly?
“I will not back down on this topic.” While backing down.
One-sided because the other side has no means of collectively noticing that it’s even happening, let alone calling it out, and let alone taking collective action.
Think of the “white flight” ethnic cleansing of American cities ~1970-today. Was there any possible way that the thoughtform “Shit guys, we’re being ethnically cleansed right now, aren’t we?” could have gotten out, any farther than one or two adjascent barstools? I don’t think so. But now it can be, at least a little.
Back then, if I was on TV like Tucker, and gathered a name and personal brand for myself, but then got run off of TV, that was it. I had no way to reach anyone else ever, besides Ron Paul’s newsletter. But not today.
I complain about censorship too, but let’s just take a second to appreciate how much better it is today. I mean shit, here we are, right?
I got to listen to some active service 4 star generals talk, all were very pro Hegseth in a very sincere tone. It’s clear they’re not just paying lip service. Also got to listen to a series of retired 4 star generals talk. They ranted a bit about how we must disobey “illegal orders”. When someone asked the active service generals about disobeying “illegal orders”, they shut that down quickly with telling him it’s his duty to assume legality unless clearly illegal like shooting prisoners who are not resisting otherwise the entire military structure breaks down into anarchy. The contrast in messaging is massive.
Hegseth kicked out subversive generals, then leftist media from the Pentagon. Really needs to work on calling back those retired generals who lost the war and court martial them or at the very least stop them from having influence in the military. One of the retired generals even went on a rant about having to currently patch up international relations under Trump II… in other words, acting in an unofficial official capacity while not authorized, if that’s not chargeable under some section of the UCMJ, then probably some federal law.
> “I will not back down on this topic.” While backing down.
I don’t, in my certain ignorance, see that at all.
From my read he appears to be 1) a concise illuminator of dire problems (and uses an in-your-face approach
[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
What is your answer to these questions?
[*deleted for not conforming to the moderation policy*]
Well that is the problem. SkipRamen is not using an in your-face-approach, but an evasive gutless weak kneed sniveling wishy washy cowardly mild-mannerede slightly-right-of-center weasel approach that refuses to acknowledge the serious nature of the problem or the drastic measures needed to solve it. This blog is an in-your-face approach.
I notice that you, like SkipRamen, are too weak cowardly, weasily and wishy washy to even dare state the question. Noticing the elelphant in the living room is just too unimaginably extremist for you.
The answer to the question is all over this blog. Just read it
There are a pile of links to relevant discussions in this blog in this thread
https://blog.reaction.la/war/trumps-twenty-eight-point-peace-plan/#comment-2985357
https://blog.reaction.la/war/trumps-twenty-eight-point-peace-plan/#comment-2985353
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/what-women-want-2/
and my most recent blog article Venezuelan conflict concludes with the words.
See also https://blog.reaction.la/culture/marriage/ and
https://blog.reaction.la/culture/how-to-restore-a-reproductively-successful-society/
As I say in “Make women property again”
And then SkipRamen says “I will not back down” as if he had been so brave as to say something that might possibly upset some leftist somewhere.
This is incredibly apparent in ‘race war in high school’. While black students are setting white teachers ablaze, beating white students to a pulp and dousing the cafeteria in gasoline, in emergency meetings the prevalent opinion among teachers is: ‘these poor kids, lashing out their generational trauma.’
The fact that what is happening is invisible to them allows it to happen.
Late to this but…
@Jim
Thus bringing in Islam and the Cartels, to use them as true-believing and righteously-violent welfare-dependent victim armies against heritage Americans.
“They think they’re using us, but we’re actually using them, trust me bro.”
I guess they intend to simply force the foot-soldiers. It works in Ukraine.
Of course, some men cannot be forced to be foot-soldiers for an evil cause, but they are perfectly willing to kill all those who cannot be forced.
Draftees are never enthusiatic foot-soldiers, but the draft usually works very well.
Huzzah! We now have the 5th generation of drone warfare powered by persistent AICCTV!
Lefter-leftists can now murder the kulacks from the safety of their own bath house via wifi and not have to worry about bleeding out or non-responsive cops.
Current warfare is moving to direct drone on drone combat, and drone versus drone operator combat.
We also see lone assassins and small assassination teams of two or three with massive drone support above them taking out drone operators.
Operating a drone is now an extremely dangerous activity, and top quality drone operators succeed in taking out very large numbers of inferior quality drone operators. We are returning to medieval heroic warfare, where battles were often won or lost by a single knight who takes out dozens of opposing knights.
Future of War is not just AICCTV… it’s a Pay-Per-View, Pay-To-Play, Peer-To-Peer, Crypto-Crowdfunded, Skins Game… where Anonymous entrants choose their favorite Flag and run with it.
Downing jet-powered drones w drones
https://x.com/wilendhornets/status/1995417826753180061
Drone v Missile Platform
https://x.com/wilendhornets/status/1995502272437219814
Daily Battle Review Podcasts
https://x.com/wilendhornets/status/1994088350144184609
https://wildhornets.com/en/
https://linktr.ee/wildhornets
With global coverage by Starlink and cell towers, the only thing stopping them from outsourcing warfare to call centers in India is latency.
The Russians stop that with lots of EW. Which drives Big Army to the mounted knight type warfare. Interestingly, it can be analogized to the heavy walled castles that also dominated warfare at the time.
Internal civil war against the kulacks will not have the same elector-magnetic terrain. Everyone else is an unprotected peasant, tilling their field and listening for the sound of approaching horses.
Small cheap drones have limited range. So you need people on the ground at the front managing them. They could have, and probably do have, someone in an office far away managing many of the drones, but this just leads to human delays because the humans on the front have to tell the people in the office what needs to be urgently destroyed. Which human to human latency is apt to lead to people on the ground managing the drone dying. So at least some of the drones need to be commanded by the humans at the front managing them. So you still need brave men facing danger.
It is back to the days of heroic warfare, where one brave man with expensive equipment, a lot of of training, and natural competence, matters, where big battles are resolved by a smaller battles one on one, or two or three on two or three.
This is not at all what people expected. We expected nerds in offices. This is not how it is being fought right now.
Thinking that civil war is not possible would be a grave miss-calculation. This nation is capable of the most astonishing levels violence on earth. Be ready when the party starts.
This. Drone warfare was supposed to be Fat Latinx’es in Nevada blowing up Based Whoever’s in Wherever-stan through 10,000 miles of miraculous White Incel technology. And that shit ain’t happening anymore except in the Carribean Sea.
These fiber-optic drones are hunting down every last armed or uniformed human being in a war zone. Every American/NATO/Taiwanese soldier can look at that video and identify with the unfortunate getting blown up.
You have to be BRAVE to go out there now. It’s a whole new ball game.
Furthermore, just how on earth does one opeate an airport, or a seaport, or a power plant, in an open-borders belligerant country, with that kind of swap meet firepower out there?
In a peer combat, if A can reach out an touch B with a drone, B can reach out and touch A with a drone. So nerds in offices are rapidly replaced by brave men in basements.
SIGINT assets are everywhere and will find your basement, which means you have to move, and you have to move in order to change area of drone coverage, so in a sense maneuver warfare is still on, it just looks different. Although counter measures to detection and sound doctrine is being developed, changing location is and will remain highly dangerous, so requires brave men.
Like I said:
>propaganda kabuki play-fighting
What you’re describing is a propaganda operation, not a battle. Maybe, maybe one or two people out of tens of thousands might get shot. This is not the same as a hot civil war. Why oh why are these deluded fools willing to take a bullet for their evil cause? They’re not. “Attacking” the military as part of an antifa mob is safer than running with the bulls, and people pay to do that.
The point of the propaganda is not to persuade people to agree with them. It is to persuade people to not respond to organised leftist violence with organised rightist violence.
It is a battle all right, hence the saying “The Jew cries out in pain as he stabs you.”
A lot more than one or two people got shot in the BLM and Antifa operations.
Detroit was burned to the ground, and the people who built it driven from their homes, which is certainly a civil war scale operation. The left conducts civil war as propaganda operations. When it actually turns into no kidding civil war, that is not what they intend.
Right now on Twitter, a whole lot of rightists are saying its time to respond to the lefts increasingly intimidating and increasingly deadly “propaganda” operations with civil war, and a whole lot of leftists are saying that is awful, while calling most Americans fascists and Nazis, thus implicitly calling for our deaths.
Similarly, John Brown murdered a whole lot of people in the bloody Kansas events, and was unpunished and celebrated as a hero, then murdered a whole lot more at Harper’s Ferry, and the right said “Hey, this is civil war”, and the left said “oh, no it is not.”
Detroit and Bloody Kansas was organised violence on the scale of civil war, it is just that the organisations doing it were crying out in pain as they stabbed normal Americans.
The same dynamic plays out in every communist revolution: propaganda convinces enough influential right-wingers to lay down their weapons, allowing a small radical contingent to take out a much larger, neutered force.
That’s why the Hegseth/grunt pipeline is potentially such a big deal. If even only one rather influential right-winger in the military refuses to swallow the smoke and mirrors propaganda, gives the remainder a schelling point to coalesce around.
>A lot more than one or two people got shot in the BLM and Antifa operations.
Sure, people on the other side. Vanishingly few “protestors” or “activists” got shot by law enforcement or the military. It’s one thing to dish it out and another to take it. They don’t think they’ll ever be on the wrong side of the equation, and they’re probably right.
With Pete Hegseth and Todd Lyons, things are likely to be different. Installing Pete Hegseth and Todd Lyons was the right preparing to defeat color revolution.
“Mostly peaceful” color revolutions are increasingly likely to fail at disarming their opposition.
It is neither a propaganda op nor a military op; it is a decision tree.
• If the right backs down, the lefties storm the palace/establish control of that neighborhood. Left wins. (Recall they actually were planning on doing this to the White House during Trump’s first term, before cooler heads prevailed and told them to step off.)
• If the right shoots a relatively small number of “peaceful protesters” – a.k.a. violent rioters throwing Molotov cocktails and 5-pound rocks at soldiers’ heads, actions which somehow won’t make it onto the nightly news – then it becomes a propaganda op. “Peaceful protesters killed without cause by fascist regime!”
The modern left, used to facing little competent resistance, thinks those are the only two possibilities with any significant probability. They don’t attach much probability to another possible outcome, for which I will quote Mayflower Sperg’s comment on another topic:
• “Machine-gun them down and thank God that our enemies were so foolish as to assemble in the open like that.” In this case the left would also use it as a propaganda op, but that would be trying to make lemonade out of lemons. It would actually be a propaganda op in favor of the good guys, because it would make all the joiners, johnny-come-latelies, and I-wanna-be-on-the-winning-side people realize that there are actually significant risks to joining the bad guys. The left can scream “Look what those fascists did!” into every microphone, but that also entails screaming “If you join our side you’ll die!” into every microphone. And it has become very obvious that a firm majority of the right-wing side of the political spectrum nowadays would say “About goddamn time.” No one, literally zero, right-wingers that I encounter online buy the “peaceful protesters” bullshit. Everyone knows that means “violent assailants.”
So that last scenario is a real possibility. I don’t know how probable it is. But the left doesn’t want that to happen and have a large percent of their soldiers gunned down, nor do the soldiers actually want to be gunned down. This is the one thing you’re right about. They’re willing to risk it, if they think the risk is small enough, but it’s not what they want to happen. What they want is of course scenario #1, in which they roll over a bunch of wussies who are too invertebrate, or worried about “optics,” to just take them all out when that’s necessary. And the “wussy” possibility may still happen. My sense is that Trump, even after the bullet clipped his ear, is still too much a mid-20th-century baby to really see the situation as it actually is. On the other hand, maybe he is simply being quiet about plans and operations that it’s necessary to be quiet about. Recall that the DOGE counterattack on the left’s funding apparatus was executed swiftly enough, and with enough OpSec, to be quite effective.
The Arab Spring inspired Scott Adams to draw this: https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-LRXYUCrLP2E/TuIsUFQ-IqI/AAAAAAAAAYM/-UudwP9bk5A/s1600/dilbert+strip+revolution.gif
If you could suggest a “peace plan” to the Trump team (and to Putin) — because in fact you actually can, right here — what would it be?
I know it mostly includes neutralizing bad actors in DC (and in London?), but how succinctly could you put it?
It needs to be a MEME. Short and repeatable. It has to fit on a bumper sticker, but if necessary a double-wide one.
If you/we/someone can do that, then please make it a new top-post, or prepend it at the top of this top-post here. Because this Ukraine situation is getting SERIOUS, and maybe-just-maybe there’s enough people with reach to get it out and into the ears of the right people. Asmongold, Nuxanor, Moldbug, guys like that. Then more people can come out of the shadows with it, etc.
If no peace deal, war continues till we get another fall of Kabul or fall of Saigon situation. Getting to the fall of Kiev involves a lot more people dying, and a lot more cities flattened, so it would be preferable to get the same place right away, without all that destruction.
Getting to that place involves the removal of the Maidan regime — which a genuinely free and fair election, in which the faction that won the last free election, the one whose outcome was overthrown by Maidan, is free to organise and campaign, would remove the Maidan regime.
The excuse for not holding any election, let alone a free and fair one, is the war. So, an explicitly temporary truce, which only lasts long enough to hold an election, and explicitly ends after the election if the new government does not negotiate a peace lickety spit, and is conditional upon the election being, in the opinion of Russia, free and fair.
In the unlikely event that a free and fair election re-elects the Maidan regime, then war resumes.
That is a sound plan, but is does not fit on a bumper sticker.
“Deus Vult” would fit on a bumper sticker. Problem is, hardly anyone would understand what it means.
Yankee solve home ^_^
“Fall of Kiev”
Silhouette picture of a helicopter loading people from the roof of a famous Kiev building. Banknotes spilling from a busted suitcase.
Maybe that’s it.
“Escape from Ukraine”
That’s probably it.
For the black-pillers on JB, I found this gem at the top of Reddit’s front page without logging in:
Early in Trump’s term we asked, “Is it a constitutional crisis?” Yeah, it was. But it’s over. We lost. Trial Courts fought valiantly, but the Supreme Court keeps abdicating & giving Trump more power. They won’t save us. And for reasons I can’t fathom, they seem to want authoritarianism – LegalEagle
Nothing sweeter than liberal tears!
I feel summoned. When you’re used to getting 99% of what you want 99% of the time, and then you’re downgraded to only 96% of what you want 96% of the time, it feels apocalyptic, like a huge defeat. I was told with Trump elected, the state agency where I work would drop DEI and pronouns would disappear from email signatures. Nope. If anything, the proggies worse than ever, energized by the weak opposition; it’s hormesis.
Mamdani may end up being our Stalin if Trump can’t pull it off (and he seems too boomer to do so lately despite a good start when he came in)…
Trump 2.0 appears to be vacillating between Trump 2.0 and 1.0. Which is alarming. On the other hand, where it matters, appointing Pete Hegseth and sending out the army to clean up the blue cities, he is still Trump 2.0.
I am very disturbed by the DoJ, and I never expected the FBI to be anything other than the enemy that it is. But when the proverbial hits the fan, the DoJ will not matter, and until the proverbial hits the fan, having a RINO DoJ makes it easier to win the supremes. The Federal Marshals are good, and the army is good. What more do you need (other than the will to use them)?
The courts, having long given themselves legislative powers, keep giving themselves executive powers, and the supremes keep taking those powers away.
Of course this is a piss poor Miliquetoast substitute for what is really needed, which is a Jackson, but the left are not wrong in seeing it as a slide to what is actually needed.
Deleted for link spam
We know all this stuff. We know, we know, we heard it all before, we already agree: Just skip to the obvious conclusion.
Democracy means that if the people lose the confidence of the government, the government dissolves the existing people and elects a new people.
Told you Bitcoin was dying.
You didn’t listen.
Now you’re poor and getting poorer.
Bitcoin is a bet on the death of fiat, hence most bitcoin investors have a long term perspective and pay no attention to the daily ups and downs. I only looked up today’s price because I felt like letting this shill post through. Most bitcoin is held by hodlers. Blockchain analysis indicates that the average exchange rate at which bitcoin last moved, the average price at which it was last purchased, is about forty thousand US federal fiat dollars. So the average Bitcoiner is rich and getting richer.
Doubtless the last time you told me I was poor and getting poorer was in April, eight months ago, when the exchange rate was below eighty thousand. And before that in 2024 August, fifteen months ago, when it was below sixty thousand. (Which dip I called, slightly late, at a bit over sixty thousand.) And before that three years ago, when it was sixteen thousand (which dip I called prematurely at twenty thousand, and then correctly called the dip spot on at sixteen thousand). And before that …
It is easier to call the dip than the peak. But easiest of all is to see the trend, which is that fiat is dying. I don’t pay much attention to the day to day details of fiat’s death throes.
Bitcoin might go down tomorrow or up tomorrow. I don’t know and I don’t care because I know where it will be in 2030. And blockchain analysis shows that this view is widely held among owners of Bitcoin. And that they have done well by thinking the way that they think.
Lol, poorer, poorer, he is poor now. Something about this seems familiar somehow.
Dig Hegseth actually say that?
Even my dog would would say that.
So what’s the problem?
Giessen Germany AfD-Youth are now under Antifa attack
https://twitter.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1969959156707958796
https://modernity.news/2025/11/29/watch-somali-enclave-standoffno-english-no-women-on-camera/
Not a single Somali has ever been of any benefit to America, not least because Islam is 100% against America and Americans.
Far too few (almost zero) have gone to call their Importing Suicidal Empathy Politicians out on that.
In “Modern” Western “Democracies”, it is the Politicians who “Vote”, the “People” are barely even last-branch Buck-Stoppers.
Crypto was supposed to change that, but has remained capability limited and under major counterforce assault.
Democrat base is vanilla soy fat fake and ghey, and of random principles/faiths, so they won’t fight much, nor very well.
Left only has bands of city-dwelling Antifa/University types, not many of them have arms skills.
Left might try to self-enlist Islam, which is a real threat if successfully activated, but doesn’t really have the numbers, yet, they will after one more breeding cycle.
Nothing ‘real’ has happened yet because the Left’s actual analysts know that as of yet they will get smoked by American Right Patriots… so their top level advice is still “Don’t, yet”.
As the calculus trends more towards parity… particularly with the numerical breeding of Islam, the Dems ongoing bulk SocCom Shift, as their honest analysts get corrupted, as China and GloboLeft activate their internal sabotage programs… odds of real action rise.
Active Trannyism/Covidism/Climatism are getting slowly idled out of favor.
Pallyism, except in Islamic circles where it is still rampant, is dying off, but the Jews are trying to rekindle it via Gaza/WB.
Left is waiting for 2026’s influence upon 2028’s Election.
Waiting for the market crash, the $38T in debt the ProgLeftDems themselves created over 112yr to come calling.
Left active now in Japan, EU, elsewhere, trying to spark the cascade crash SocCom relies on for entry.
2016 was the recognition.
2020 was the coup.
2024 was the restoration attempt.
2026 will be the open call for random recruits, bootcamp.
2028 will be the formal alignment and tasking of forces.
Working on that, but for the past few months have been distracted by IRL crises.
The destruction of marriage led to the social security crisis, the crisis of missing grandchildren. The 2008 crisis was the result of a 2005 project to turn subhuman welfare recipients into middle class taxpayers, and the open borders project was to import not only more voters, but more taxpayers. Which, of course failed catastrophically and ruinously as a solution to the social security crisis of the missing grandchildren, merely resulting in more crime and more welfare dependency, not more taxpayers.
The upcoming crisis is not going to be a crisis of the thirty eight trillion debt, but the discovery of a whole lot of bad debt being carried at full value on the books of many financial entities, who will receive another 2008 style bailout — as long as holders of bad debt keep being bailed out, we are going to get every bigger bailouts, until the the ultimate guarantor, the federal reserve, itself goes bust.
The upcoming crisis is that we are now in yet another AI autumn, when optimism leading to malinvestment becomes scamming leading to malinvestment (the AI industry is now industriously manufacturing unfunded promises to buy AI services, and then borrowing against those unfunded promises, so expect an implosion very shortly, which will probably touch off further implosions.) AI winter is coming up, when the malinvestment is wrung out of the system. As the malinvestment is wrung out, an enormous amount of bad debt, only some of it AI related, is going to surface. Most of it will not be AI malinvestment related bad debt, but big blue city real estate malinvestment related bad debt. The finance system is keeping the big blue megalopoli artificially afloat. (The finance system has been “investing” in the big blue megalopoli for much the same reason as Disney “invests” in movies about gay eleven year old boys coming out and Mary Sue action girl.) Which is sending it massively bankrupt, leading to another 2008 style bailout, and thus another massive increase in federal debt.
Expecting AI winter bust leading to big blue city real estate bust to be 2026-2027, Federal reserve bust to be maybe 2030-2032. Expecting civil war II and/or World War III to supervene before federal reserve collapse, probably during or shortly after AI crash and big blue megalopoli real estate crash.
Jim, could you clarify what is meant here by “bad debt”?
I’m guessing that it means debts that are for all practical terms, unrecoverable, and which should really be written off, the lenders having to accept that they will never get that money back.
Yes. Bad debts are loans that the lender should not have made and now should write off.
On the plus side, societal breakdown at temperate latitudes is 100% fatal to brown and black people. White men become warriors, white women become their property, and niggers become food.
Roman Britain had an abundance of racial diversity. Post-Roman England was 100% white Anglo-Saxon.
For a more recent example, see how quickly the imported diversity cleared out of Ukraine in early 2022.
The real danger to the white race is if there is no collapse, only a gradual decline into shitskin world.
Also look at how Detroit is depopulating while Atlanta is not. HVAC needs to be maintained to survive the winters in Detroit. It gets cold there in the Winter time.
Do posts on this blog contain a permalink? Any way to get one other than grabbing an ID via View Source?
Posts have permalinks, which you will see in your browser url bar, but comment permalinks are, irritatingly, only visible in the recent comments list. So inconveniently, if you want a permalink to a comment, have to view source or grab it while it is hot.
If you click on a comment in the recent comments list, the permalink to the comment is in your browser url bar.
So it is now time for me to show off a trick I figured out to be able to hyperlink to older comments.
For example, the post from Jim that I am replying to has a hyper link of: https://blog.reaction.la/war/trumps-twenty-eight-point-peace-plan/#comment-2985346
But how can I figure that out what it is if it is not in the side bar of recent comment? The trick is that their is a “Reply” button. When you press it, it will take you to a link that looks like: https://blog.reaction.la/war/trumps-twenty-eight-point-peace-plan/?replytocom=2985346#respond
The key here is that by using the number that shows up before the text “#respond”, I can then use that number after a “#comment-” on any link of a main post, to give me the link to that comment.
Now, for the comments that don’t have a reply button, It takes more work, but can be done by manually incrementing the post number up or down by 1 at a time and manually checking, since posts get their number in order of when the post was made. So older posts will always have a smaller number, and newer posts will have a bigger number.
ooh that’s smart.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1995923014077350386
If current trends continue, Whites will go from being a small minority of world population today to virtually extinct!
@WallStreetApes
White people are on the verge of extinction Global population of white people: 100 years ago roughly 35% 50 years ago roughly 20% 25 years ago 15% Today just 8% White people are the minorities and must take their countries back. No more tolerance. No more suicidal empathy
I will not back down on this topic.
Got a problem with it?
Go in person and tell your GloboHomo Politicians to get the fuck out of office.
And yet you are backing down on this topic, and if you cannot state plainly what the position of this blog is on the topic, you are, in accordance with the moderation policy, going on moderation.
Whites are going extinct through failure to reproduce. What is causing failure to reproduce? What needs to be done about this? And what do we say is causing it and needs to be done about this?
Margaret Atwood told us in 1985 what needs to be done about this.
The main thing she got wrong is that no state would ever dissolve a marriage just because one party was previously divorced. That would break up intact families and needlessly enrage large numbers of men.
But dismissing all women from their jobs and transferring their bank accounts to their husbands, fathers, or the state, that part would totally work.
There should be an entire new post dedicated to suggesting, deriving, and reviewing a worthwhile list of Books.
Most women who write stories about the solution believe they are deploring it, while they type one handed.
But I am pretty sure that some of them are in fact consciously urging the solution with enough plausible deniability that they don’t get cancelled, deplatformed, and demonetised.
Atwood makes no such pretense. In the book’s epilogue, historians in the year 2195 discuss how this story they dubbed “The Handmaid’s Tale” recently came to light, what it tells us about the early years of Gilead’s rather long history, and what little is known of the persons involved. Gilead, which no longer exists, is not judged good or evil, it’s just an interesting thing for them to study.
Do read the whole book.
Whites are going extinct through failure to reproduce. What is causing failure to reproduce? What needs to be done about this? And what do we say is causing it and needs to be done about this?
Hi SkipRamen, the demand that Jim is making of you is an entirely reasonable one, and if you ignore it you won’t get to post on his blog.
Jim doesn’t expect everyone to agree with everything he believes, but he does require that anyone who comments here show that they are able to describe what he believes.
Thermidor, Trump, Vance… If you search ‘Christmas Eve’ on Google, you get an explicit Christian doodle on screen. You get a cross, a star on the tree, and a manger.
AI calls it effectively new, that they’ve always avoided this kind of symbolism in the past. I did a wayback machine check for 2024, 24 December, and the google homepage is just some tinsel and lights, with a link to the Santa Tracker.
I was impressed by the observation about wrapping paper in Walmart not showing Christian imagery, but inclined to think that in the current climate, the observation is likely to randomly stop being true
As a result of death of Charlie Kirk, the tense and fragile truce between the Christian Nationalist elements of Maga, and the Jewish elements, has broken. Tucker says the Jewish elements are just going to have to suck it up. I hope he is correct.
If the conflict continues into the 2026 elections, we have a problem.